Hi Daniel and J-P,
Thanks for your advice. I will try what you suggest.
I feel like a bit of an idiot here, but I can't seem to find the source
code for the interpolate_boundary_values() function. I've rooted around
various source folders on Git and most of them don't contain much e.g.
https:/
Krishna,
[...]
> Can someone please point me in the right direction regarding the
> documentation of this class for the latest release of dealii?
>
Have a look at
https://www.dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/changes_between_8_5_0_and_9_0_0.html,
item 70.
Best,
Daniel
--
The deal.II project i
I was just finishing Prof Bangerth's video lecture 21 wherein the concept
of Schur Complement is introduced. For computing the inverse of the mass
matrix (M), it looks like Dealii uses the facilities of the
IterativeInverse class.
The latest notes in the webpage for the
lecture, https://www.ma
Do you use Tecplot to calculate vorticity from the velocity field or do you
calculate the vorticity from your code, and then visualize it from tecplot?
The way deal.II visualizes gradients (or vorticity in this case) is the
correct way it should be done, because it is visualized on an "element
b
Found a bug in the library, reported here:
https://github.com/dealii/dealii/issues/9405, and therefore I got wrong
results.
Am Sonntag, 19. Januar 2020 13:50:58 UTC+1 schrieb Maxi Miller:
>
> Hei,
> I attached a working MWE. Changing between the approach suggested above
> and scale() is done by
When applying the laplace operator to my solution vector, what is the
difference between forming an explicit matrix containing the laplace
operator by using
template
void LaplaceProblem::assemble_mass_matrix (){
TimerOutput::Scope t(computing_timer, "Mass matrix assembly");
Dear Jean-Paul, thanks again for your support and kind suggestions.
I have worked with MappingQEulerian some time before, and as I remember, I
dropped it because it requires the use of a vector field defined in the
whole domain in order to curve geometries.
After this, I started using ChartManif
Dear Jean-Paul, thanks again for your support and kind suggestions.
I have worked with MappingQEulerian some time before, and as I remember, I
dropped it because it requires a vector field define in the whole domain in
order to curve the geometry.
After this, I started using ChartManifolds and T
Dear Jean-Paul, thanks again for your support and kind suggestions.
I have worked with MappingQEulerian some time before, and as I remember, I
dropped it because it requires a vector field define in the whole domain in
order to curve the geometry.
After this, I started using ChartManifolds and T
