On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 18:58 CDT, Bruno Blais wrote:
> Dear Matthias,
> If I understand correctly, the only constraint of working this way is that
> all tests for a single executable must be grouped in a single folder, and
> that a single folder can test a single executable?
> That's perfec
Hahaha, that is amazing!
So much documentation that sometimes documentation becomes its own enemy :P
Thanks for everything! That will definitely be incredibly helpful (not only
to me, but to others)!
On Wednesday, 14 August 2019 20:00:00 UTC-4, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, a
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 18:57 CDT, Matthias Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 18:55 CDT, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
> This is actually explained here:
>
> https://www.dealii.org/current/users/testsuite.html
AND I apparently created a demo repository showcasing all of that:
Dear Matthias,
If I understand correctly, the only constraint of working this way is that
all tests for a single executable must be grouped in a single folder, and
that a single folder can test a single executable?
That's perfect. I will try that tomorrow.
If I manage to make that work, it is exa
Wolfgang,
there was a little bit of CMake development behind your back *cough*
*cough* (Luca wanted to have the feature Bruno was asking about).
Best,
Matthias
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 18:16 CDT, Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
> Bruno,
>
>> I am re-implementing some tests on our solvers (followin
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 18:55 CDT, Matthias Maier wrote:
> [...]
This is actually explained here:
https://www.dealii.org/current/users/testsuite.html
:-D
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/de
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, at 13:38 CDT, Bruno Blais wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am re-implementing some tests on our solvers (following
> https://www.dealii.org/developer/developers/testsuite.html#layoutaddtests)
> Right now, it is really easy to test individual applications with a
> combination of e
Bruno,
> I am re-implementing some tests on our solvers (following
> https://www.dealii.org/developer/developers/testsuite.html#layoutaddtests)
> Right now, it is really easy to test individual applications with a
> combination of executable + output + prm file.
> We also test with various num
Perfect. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks, Wolfgang.
> On Aug 14, 2019, at 4:58 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> On 8/13/19 5:34 PM, Shiva Rudraraju wrote:
>> Thanks for the pointer, Vivek. I did check the usual locations,
>> including fe_values.h, but couldn’t locate the exact i
On 8/13/19 5:34 PM, Shiva Rudraraju wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer, Vivek. I did check the usual locations,
> including fe_values.h, but couldn’t locate the exact implementation of
> the computation for the hessian in the real cell coordinates. (Should
> involve the product of shape function he
Hello,
I am trying to implement and HDG like method from [1], but without the
elimination process described in step 51. Thereby creating a block matrix.
To implement this I use as finite element a system of FE_DGQ + FE_FaceQ. On
the face I need to compute integrals between the functions from th
Francis (^^)
If you look at the documentation of the temporal interpolator of paraview (
https://www.paraview.org/Wiki/Advanced_Animations) you will see that it
enforces that the support for your data (the mesh) remains constant
throughout the time series. Consequently, you cannot use it with ad
Hello all,
I am re-implementing some tests on our solvers (following
https://www.dealii.org/developer/developers/testsuite.html#layoutaddtests)
Right now, it is really easy to test individual applications with a
combination of executable + output + prm file.
We also test with various number of pr
I really enjoyed reading this! Thanks!
Melanie
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 8:12:02 PM UTC-4, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
>
> All,
> if you want to read a bit about how I got into open source software, and
> how I
> see my role in deal.II, here's something that just came out:
>
>
> https://bs
On 8/14/19 4:24 AM, Michał Wichrowski wrote:
>
> It nothing big, but I thing adding method fill_random(const double& a=-1.,
> const double &b=1.) to vector classes that will fill a vector with random
> values (from range [a,b]) would be useful. I'm using it in most of my
> programs, it's great
Dear all,
It nothing big, but I thing adding method fill_random(const double& a=-1.,
const double &b=1.) to vector classes that will fill a vector with random
values (from range [a,b]) would be useful. I'm using it in most of my
programs, it's great for testing solvers, especially multigrid sm
>
>
> So you want to a separate function that calls the current interface with
> default constructed MGConstraindedDoFs objects?
> We are happy to have a look and discuss if you create a pull request for
> this.
>
> Thanks, for reporting the problem with the default constructor. I will
> have a
17 matches
Mail list logo
