Maxi,
Can you just try again with a recent commit?
Best,
Daniel
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"deal.I
Franco,
> [...]
> As I didn't find a 1:1 correspondence between the two namespaces, I've
> resorted to remove Trilinos classes as best as I could, for instance,
> TrilinosWrappers::BlockSparseMatrix exists but in PETSc there is only
> PETScWrappers::MPI::BlockSparseMatrix that I know of. And
Thanks Daniel, it worked.
On Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 9:59:08 PM UTC-4, Daniel Arndt wrote:
>
> Vivek,
>
> just remove the line
> if (i->first >= range.first && i->first < range.second)
> VectorTools::interpolate_boundary_values should only set values for
> locally active degrees of freedom an
Dear all,
I am trying to port the Trilinos examples, for instance Step-31, to PETSc.
I am finding some difficulties, though, in the block matrix class, it seems
a little bit different from Trilinos. In this function:
template
void BoussinesqFlowProblem::solve()
{
std::cout << " Sol
