>
> OK, thank you for your help.
>
Kyusik.
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"deal.II User Group" group.
On 4/23/19 9:02 PM, hanks0...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Do you think this problem is related to "min_grid_level=0"
>
> I solve my problem just by changing from "min_grid_level=0 &
> max_grid_level=3"
> to min_grid_level=1 & max_grid_level=4"
>
> But I can't understand why this change solve this seg
Dr. Bangerth,
Thank you for your answer.
But, could I have one more question...?
Do you think this problem is related to "min_grid_level=0"
I solve my problem just by changing from "min_grid_level=0 &
max_grid_level=3" to min_grid_level=1 & max_grid_level=4"
But I can't understand why thi
Hello everyone!
This is deal.II newsletter #76.
It automatically reports recently merged features and discussions about the
deal.II finite element library.
## Below you find a list of recently proposed or merged features:
#7949: Documentation fix for DerivativeForm (proposed by rezarastak)
ht
On 4/23/19 11:48 AM, Moraad Biagooi wrote:
> In MPI part, that is developed from tutorial step-40, I need to use
> 'Point_value' and 'Point_gradient' template functions.
>
> My question is, how should I use these functions when the cells of these
> points are not (necessarily) locally owned?
>
Dear all,
I am developing on a molecular dynamics (MD) code which some part of it
uses Deal.II for force calculations.
The non-MPI part works very well.
In MPI part, that is developed from tutorial step-40, I need to use
'Point_value' and 'Point_gradient' template functions.
My question is,
