No, you were right,
I couldn't get the correct results without
'Triangulation::add_periodicity()'.
The current my local environment does not configure deal.ii with MPI and
Trilinos as the example step-45, which shows how this function is used.
But I guess I can still use the " 'Triangulation
You were right. I couldn't get the correct results without
Triangulation::add_periodicity().
So, it seems that I should compile deal.ii with MPI,P4EST,Trilinos to use
that function(Triangulation::add_periodicity()) since my triangulation
should be parallel distributed...
Right?
Best,
Jaek
Dear Jean-Paul,
It was a mistake in my part. I deleted the post as soon as I found out my
mistake.
There is no problem with the code in trying what I want to do.
I was confused between different ways of distributing triangulations that
are
offered (e.g. step-17,18 vs step-40). Please do not both