Thanks a lot for the pointers!
El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 22:57:24 (UTC+2), Wolfgang Bangerth
escribió:
>
> On 08/17/2018 02:56 PM, Juan Carlos Araujo Cabarcas wrote:
> > Hej, thanks for your prompt answer!
> > Yes, your interpretation of my poor description is correct. So then I
> jus
On 08/17/2018 02:56 PM, Juan Carlos Araujo Cabarcas wrote:
Hej, thanks for your prompt answer!
Yes, your interpretation of my poor description is correct. So then I just
need to create a new FEValues within the cell loop containing the points where
I want to evaluate the shape functions, right?
Hej, thanks for your prompt answer!
Yes, your interpretation of my poor description is correct. So then I just
need to create a new FEValues within the cell loop containing the points
where I want to evaluate the shape functions, right? How do I add this
points?
Also if the points are in the
Juan,
I would like to ask what would be the best/fastest way to evaluate
*fe_v.shape_value
> (i,x), **fe_v.shape_grad* *(i,x)*, in points that are not quadrature
> points but that are guaranteed to lie within the curved cell/quad.
>
If I understand the situation correctly, you have a FEValues o
Dear all,
In step 46 (and step 22 too if possible) for stokes, how to we ensure that
the pressure is uniquely defined (i.e. that it is in L^2_0)?
Kind regards,
Georgios
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/
