Thanks WB
best
On Thursday, 29 June 2017 17:02:00 UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
>
> On 06/29/2017 08:42 AM, 'Franck Kalala' via deal.II User Group wrote:
> >
> > An error occurred in line <3635> of file
> >
>
>
>
> > in function
> > void dealii::FEValues spacedim>::initialize(deali
Thank JP
Best
On Thursday, 29 June 2017 17:01:40 UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote:
>
> Dear Franck,
>
> It looks like you're passing the flag "update_normal_vectors" to an
> FEValues object, which is not sensible as it is used only for volume
> calculations (as opposed to surface calculations)
Fred,
For the compute_nonzero_normal_flux(), I want to generate a a constraint like
this:
Require that $q\in W_h$ is such that for all test functions $\lambda \in
\Trace V_h$ we have
$$
0 = \int_{\Gamma_N} \lambda ((q-g)\dot \eta) \dee x
$$
That looks easy enough if W_h is so that the no
Dear Franck,
It looks like you're passing the flag "update_normal_vectors" to an
FEValues object, which is not sensible as it is used only for volume
calculations (as opposed to surface calculations). I think that this is the
propogation of the flags that leads to the issue:
DarcySys
On 06/29/2017 08:42 AM, 'Franck Kalala' via deal.II User Group wrote:
An error occurred in line <3635> of file
in function
void dealii::FEValues::initialize(dealii::UpdateFlags)
[with int dim = 2; int spacedim = 2]
The violated condition was:
(update_flags & update_normal_vectors)
Hello all
I am trying to rewrite step-43 in parallel follwing paths of step-32. I
want just first to solve the darcy system then after I will move on solving
the saturation equation in time. While trying to slove the darcy system I
am having this errror message below:
The trace back is easy to fo
Hello there,
I'm currently building dealii via candi on a brand new cluster and I am
facing a few issues.
First, this is what I am compiling with
1) nixpkgs/.16.093) gcccore/.5.4.05) openmpi/2.1.1
2) StdEnv/2016.4 4) gcc/5.4.0 6) imkl/11.3.4.258
GNU bash, ver
Dear Phil,
please open a new issue in this group and reference the issue discussion
from github.
Kind regards
Uwe
On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:28:55 PM UTC+2, Phil H wrote:
>
> Hi Uwe - I managed to work around the USABLE FLAGS by simply commenting
> out the relevant lines of code in th
