[deal.II] Does dell.II support comformal mesh adaption.

Dear sir: I want to use the mesh adaptive capability of dell.II for my incompressible flow FVM computation. I want to know that does dell.II suport conformal mesh adaption(do not have hanging node in the face). Regards ztdepya...@gmail.com -- The deal.II project is located at http:

Re: [deal.II] Re: cmake-gui mpi

Thank you . I solve it by specify the "native compiler" as mpic++ when i start cmake-gui. It works fine now. Regards ztdepya...@gmail.com From: Jean-Paul Pelteret Date: 2017-05-17 13:14 To: deal.II User Group Subject: [deal.II] Re: cmake-gui mpi Dear Peng, This part of the installation docum

[deal.II] Re: Getting error during cmake configuration step and later during make run

Hi, When googling I found the following info: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/17372 Could it be that the installer for v8.5.0 was not built for mac os x Sierra? Anyone having a success running on Sierra? Thanks, Vikram On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 7:12:40 AM UTC-5, Vikram Bhamidipati w

[deal.II] Re: Adding periodicity to a thin sample with one element in thickness direction

Hi Hamed, You're welcome. I'm glad that we helped you resolve the issue! Best, Jean-Paul On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 4:07:08 PM UTC+2, Hamed Babaei wrote: > > Hello all, > > You are right. I was running in debug mode, slowing down the code. > Thank you very much for your incredible help. I app

[deal.II] Re: Adding periodicity to a thin sample with one element in thickness direction

Hello all, You are right. I was running in debug mode, slowing down the code. Thank you very much for your incredible help. I appreciate your kindness and generosity to support the community. Best regards, Hamed -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/foru

[deal.II] Re: assembling question

You're welcome! On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 1:08:24 PM UTC+2, Ashkan Dorostkar wrote: > > Thank you, > This helped a lot. I didn't remember that rule at the moment. > > Ali > > On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 12:38:48 PM UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: >> >> Dear Ali, >> >> If you apply the prod

[deal.II] Re: assembling question

Thank you, This helped a lot. I didn't remember that rule at the moment. Ali On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 12:38:48 PM UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > > Dear Ali, > > If you apply the product rule > to this term, does it then look a little more man

[deal.II] Re: assembling question

Thanks, I didn't remember this when I sent the question. On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 12:38:48 PM UTC+2, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > > Dear Ali, > > If you apply the product rule > to this term, does it then look a little more managable? > > Regards,

[deal.II] Re: assembling question

Dear Ali, If you apply the product rule to this term, does it then look a little more managable? Regards, Jean-Paul On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 12:20:18 PM UTC+2, Ashkan Dorostkar wrote: > > Dear all, > I want to solve a system of equation for elas

[deal.II] assembling question

Dear all, I want to solve a system of equation for elasticity and I have an extra term in the my equations which is of the form -grad(b.u) here "b" is a vector of size DIM and "u" is the displacements with DIM components. I am a bit lost on how to express this with fe_values. Any help is ap

Re: [deal.II] Error in the second derivative of solution...?

Thats great! I'm glad that you've managed to work it out :-) Best, Jean-Paul On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 10:06:18 AM UTC+2, hanks0...@gmail.com wrote: > > Thank you very much!! > > It seems that I can solve my problem. > > Thank you! > > Kyusik. > -- The deal.II project is located at http:/

Re: [deal.II] Error in the second derivative of solution...?

Thank you very much!! It seems that I can solve my problem. Thank you! Kyusik. -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: [deal.II] Re: Step 13 & 14 -- Different BCs on different boundary indicators

Dear Elena, I want to do something like below code, but I don't know how to write it > correctly: > > template > void > Solver::*assemble_linear_system *(LinearSystem &linear_system) > { > > VectorTools::interpolate_boundary_values (dof_handler, >

Re: [deal.II] Re: Step 13 & 14 -- Different BCs on different boundary indicators

Dear Bruno, I would like to somehow pass the boundary indicator to the boundary value function. I don't know if it is possible to write *boundary_values(0) or not? I want to do something like below code, but I don't know how to write it correctly: template void Solver::*assemble_linear