[deal.II] Re: where and how should I use the MeshWorker class? how should I do to implement DG without MeshWorker?

2016-08-27 Thread yoczhang
Dear Daniel Thanks for your answer, the 7.1.0 version of step-12 seems also using the MeshWorker, i find the 6.2.1 version of step-12 without using MeshWorker: https://www.dealii.org/6.2.1/doxygen/deal.II/step_12.html I want to repeat the numerical example of the references, which is a stokes

[deal.II] Re: assembling individual block step 43

2016-08-27 Thread Daniel Arndt
Dear Franck, > I am looking at step-43 using different method. I do a semi discretization > in space and end up with an ode for the saturation and use different > technique for time integration for the saturation. > > For this I will need to assemble the matrix H after solving for the > veloci

[deal.II] Re: where and how should I use the MeshWorker class? how should I do to implement DG without MeshWorker?

2016-08-27 Thread Daniel Arndt
An old version of step-12[1] has an implementation that doesn't use MeshWorker. In my opinion, it is covenient to use MeshWorker if you can when you want to consider discontinuous ansatz spaces due to the different cases that can occur for face contributions. If you want or need to use more than

Re: [deal.II] Re: Getting number of hanging support points

2016-08-27 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
And for the record, attached is a corrected version of the MWE illustrating the correct and intended behaviour of constraint creation for pure p-refinement. Number of cells: 2 Number of degrees of freedom: 11 Number of constraints: 1 On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 9:41:41 AM UTC+2, Jean-Paul

Re: [deal.II] Re: Getting number of hanging support points

2016-08-27 Thread Jean-Paul Pelteret
Ha ha. Dammit, what a silly mistake :-) Thanks Wolfgang! On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:08:17 PM UTC+2, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > On 08/25/2016 02:34 AM, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > > Hi Deepak, > > > > Ok, so I've created a minimal working example to demonstrate what you're > > seeing he