Bastien,
Unfortunately, you won't be able to achieve what you want directly with
make_periodicity_constraints.
The offset vector would help you with something like u(0,y)=u(1,y+lambda).
For what you want to do you would first create the constraints for
u(0,y)=u(1,y) and modify the corresponding
Giovanna,
can you run a simple "hello world" program with MPI?
Best,
Bruno
On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 4:48:24 PM UTC-4, Giovanna Bucci wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have compiled deal II without problems (see attached detailed.log file
> for settings) on a new machine with Ubuntu 16.04. However a
Hello,
I have compiled deal II without problems (see attached detailed.log file
for settings) on a new machine with Ubuntu 16.04. However all the tests
fail. It looks like there is some problem with linking libraries and it is
related to openmpi (see quicktest.log file attached), but I can't fi
On 06/08/2016 09:26 AM, Marco Delchini wrote:
Our objective is to solve for two-phase flows in multi-D using a fully
implicit temporal scheme. In the short term, we would need the Trilinos
solver/perconditioner capabilities and also are very interested in the Sacado
package that does automatic d
Hi,
Thanks a lot, it works well now! I don't know if I misread step-45, but I
don't think it is written in it that boundary_ids should be setup before
any refinement. And if you take something like step-44, boundry_ids are
setup after refining the mesh.
So maybe it would be wise to detail it in
Jonathan,
Sorry, you're right -- the distribute() function is not the culprit here.
I remember having the exact same issue a while ago, but don't quite
remember what caused it. Can you post your program here?
Artur
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/f
Respected user,
I am new to dealii and just started solving test problems using tutorials.
My objective is to solve the mathematical model having integral over the
area and integral over the internal boundary. this internal boundary can be
considered as the interface between two material. My pl
Dear Daniel,
I am sorry It is a typo error, actually, I have old_s =
old_solution_values[q_point](1) which represents the solution at previous
time step i.e. U(t_{n-1}) and old_s0 =
old_solution_values0 [q_point](1) which represents the solution at time
(t_{n-2}) i.e. U(t_{n-2}) and old_s1 =
Thank you for your helpful information.
I was wondering if there would be any difficulties for parallelization of
the code when using block matrices and vectors. would you please let me
know if you have paralleled your code.
Thanks,
Hamed
On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 4:48:49 AM UTC-5, ha.ba..
Marco,
2016-06-08 10:26 GMT-04:00 Marco Delchini :
> What would be the main difference between Epetra and Tpetra? What would be
> the benefits of using Tpetra over Epetra?
With Tpetra, you can use Kokkos and you need Kokkos to run Trilinos on GPUs.
> Our objective is to solve for two-phase flows
Jean-Paul and Bruno,
thanks for your answer, this is helpful.
What would be the main difference between Epetra and Tpetra? What would be
the benefits of using Tpetra over Epetra?
Our objective is to solve for two-phase flows in multi-D using a fully
implicit temporal scheme. In the short term, w
Mohammad,
first of all
const double old_s = old_solution_values[q_point](1);
const double old_s = old_solution_values0[q_point](1);
const double old_s = old_solution_values1[q_point](1);
looks weird. Are you redefining old_s all the time?
Apart from that it looks so far good to me. Can you
Dear all,
Any advice will be appreciated.
Best regards
Mohammad Sabawi
On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 10:29:45 AM UTC+1, Mohammad Sabawi wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I am solving a 3x3 block system arising form DG time discretisation of the
> semilinear parabolic equations in the form u_t - \De
Marco,
like Jean-Paul said the Trilinos wrappers are mainly for the linear
algebra. This doesn't mean that you can't use a package that we don't have
wrapper for. You can always get the underlying Trilinos object from the
wrapper and use it when you need to call another package. When you choose
I have solve a thermoelastic problem using block matrices and block vectors
and a same dofhandler for the displacement and temperature fields.
Fully coupled thermal-stress analysis is needed when the stress analysis is
dependent on the temperature distribution and the temperature distributio
15 matches
Mail list logo
