On 27 jun 2005, at 17.02, Christian Haugg wrote:
sometimes i have the problem that one or two of my dbmail.imapd
processes run with 100% CPU Load, also when nobody is connected to the
IMAP Server.
When i stop the imapd and start it again it will works fine for 1
till 3
weeks and then the s
On 11 sep 2005, at 06.36, Nathan Zabaldo wrote:
I have dbmail, spamassassin, postfix up and running no problems
whatsoever for about a year now.
My question is regarding how I can spamassassin 3.03 to sa-learn
spam messages. Obviously I can’t point it to the database to the
offending
On 12 sep 2005, at 01.17, Nathan Zabaldo wrote:
Robert Claeson wrote:
>I'm sure there's a good way, but I tend to export the offending
mail(s) from my mail client (Apple Mail, which can export in Mbox
format), scp it to the server and run sa-learn on it there. Clumsy,
On 28 sep 2005, at 22.57, Eric Soroos wrote:
Since there are only a couple of forward incompatible changes in
postgres and many administration and performance improvements,
there's very little reason not to be running one of the last couple
stable versions 7.4 or 8.0.
I'm running Postgre
On 4 maj 2006, at 07.11, Demi wrote:
And I have not found a single reason why Sendmail could be better
then Postfix.
It is more configurable. It's vastly more difficult to configure, but
it's more configurable. Most of the things you can do with sendmail
that you can't with Postfix will
On 9 maj 2006, at 18.06, Kneschke.Lars wrote:
Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
I don't see any reference to secure imap/pop on the wiki features
request page. As far as I can tell, there is no ssl/tls support yet,
correct?
Search the wiki for stunnel or follow this link:
http://www.
I need to enable services POP3 and/or IMAP on a per-user basis such
that user A can only log in via POP3 while user B can log in via both
POP3 and IMAP.
I'm currently running 2.0 and plan to upgrade to 2.2 when it's ready
for production use.
Will it have such functionality, or would I hav
On 9 maj 2006, at 18.53, Robert Claeson wrote:
I need to enable services POP3 and/or IMAP on a per-user basis such
that user A can only log in via POP3 while user B can log in via
both POP3 and IMAP.
I'm currently running 2.0 and plan to upgrade to 2.2 when it's
ready for prod
On 10 May 2006, at 04:54, Blake Mitchell wrote:
Ron Peterson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:58:16PM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:06:09PM +0200, Kneschke.Lars wrote:
Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
I don't see any reference to secure imap/pop on the wiki
On 9 Sep 2006, at 11:23, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Guys,
I need to do the folowing, i have an separate account, for example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and i have the normal accounts:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and i want all email that goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to go t
t a copy of the emails into
another account also.
- Original Message -----
From: Robert Claeson
To: DBMail mailinglist
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Forwarding
On 9 Sep 2006, at 11:23, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Guys,
I need to do the folowing, i have an s
Hey, we can even make a protocol for that! Let's call it... uhm... SMTP.
On 1 Dec 2006, at 19:02, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But you miss the whole point of having an API in the first place.
It gives you the means to simplay and SAFELY manage/munge the data
without worrying
On 29 Dec 2006, at 03:38, Rod K wrote:
That's still not an elegant solution. The best solution would be
be to write a constraint or domain in the DB that would prevent
uppercase characters being inserted at all no matter where the
insertion is coming from.
That's what I would call a bru
On 6 Apr 2007, at 17:45, Eric Hiller wrote:
When running top, the postmaster process is what takes up all the cpu.
I ran the vacuumdb last night, and that decreased the load time of
a message from 5+ seconds to 2+ seconds, still pretty long though.
You may want to also run reindexdb on the
On 16 Apr 2007, at 03:35, Josh Marshall wrote:
This is just preliminary findings, but if you set the number of
IMAP connections to cache in Thunderbird to 0 (defaults to 5) the
speed is much improved (in my case a hundredfold) and there's less
likelihood for the error messages about messag
On 25 Jul 2007, at 18:48, Aaron Stone wrote:
DBMail never accepts responsibility for a message that cannot be
immediately delivered. To do so would make it into a full MTA --
the key
function of an MTA is to say to another MTA, "Yes, I'll take this
message,
and I'll agree to hold it for as
On 21 Dec 2007, at 16:33, Marc Dirix wrote:
Yes. I still think MySQL has core-problems, which are due to the
original project goal
(being fast for small applications, instead of feature rich, stable
or sql compliant).
Not only that. MySQL was originally devised as a small, fast content
d
On 29 Dec 2007, at 20:09, Aaron Stone wrote:
The risk of collision is very small, but is real -- every has
acknowledged
that. Then there's the evaluation of the risk, which we also all
know to
be extremely small, and the cost of mitigation, which involves a
little
decision making and some
On 25 Jan 2008, at 13:08, Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Freitag, 25. Januar 2008 Simon Lange wrote:
Well a-z and 0-9 should be all he needs.
We're hosting companies that we cannot control, nor would they want to
accept that.
"löl" is not a secure password anyway.
More secure than "jfhguieh"
On 25 Jan 2008, at 14:25, Simon Lange wrote:
What comes next? Chinese symbols?!
Yes, quite likely. There is actually real, living people, using
computers, living there.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
DBmail mailing list
On 28 Jan 2008, at 23:03, Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Montag, 28. Januar 2008 Michael luich wrote:
The only REAL answer is to encrypt the message at it's
source and decrypt it at it's destination. And this requires a lot
more than Dbmail can handle alone.
Yes, and it's called PGP or GnuPG. No
On 28 Jun 2008, at 12:27, Daniel Urstöger wrote:
I just wanted to add that Mac Mail does open more then one connection
based on this behavior too. So if you browse around your IMAP folders
one could have around 5 or more connections at once ...
Yup, and it really causes the email server to ch
On 3 Jan 2009, at 19:41, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Ah yes, an export clause in the license. I wasn't aware of that one.
Anyway, it always seemed to me that activesync with email only, is no
improvement over IMAP-IDLE, really.
There's no real push in either, anyway.
Perhaps not, but many mobile
23 matches
Mail list logo
