Hello,
Somebody knows when there will be release 2.2? Or 2.1.6?
--
Maxim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
i have alt linux master 2.4 with glib 2.4.8 and gmime 2.1.7.
I wish to make dbmail 2.2 which demands newer versions of these libraries. It is
possible as that in parallel to establish the necessary versions of these
libraries?
--
С уважением,
Maxim mailto:[EMAIL
ou
[13:19:43] S: 1 c867ebf5621269b29b06a93d5ba52ec4
[13:19:43] S: .
[13:19:43] C: RETR 1
[13:19:43] S: +OK 1036 octets
--
С уважением,
Maxim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
Здравствуйте, Maxim.
Вы писали 21 июня 2007 г., 13:54:46:
M> Hi,
M> dbmail-pop3 no return messages.
M> The database is opened in UTF8, the problem can in it?
M> log:
M> [13:19:39] C: Connected to mail.xxx.ru, port 110
M> [13:19:40] S: +OK DBMAIL pop3 server ready to rock
M&
mail/pop3d[27564]: Debug:[misc]
misc.c,create_unique_id(+111): created:
164a1e198210409666a86605a063af70
Jun 21 17:59:12 bosko-l dbmail/pop3d[27564]: Debug:[pop3] pop3.c,pop3(+295):
incoming buffer: [USER maxim]
Jun 21 17:59:12 bosko-l dbmail/pop3d[27564]: Debug:[pop3] pop3.c,pop3(+309):
c
Здравствуйте, Maxim.
Вы писали 21 июня 2007 г., 19:19:05:
M> Hi.
M> LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8
M> postgresql in UTF8
M> dbmail.conf:
M> encoding = utf8
M> default_msg_encoding = utf8
M> Mail client TheBat! 3.99.1
M> Mozilla Thunderbird 2.0.0.4
M> dbmail-pop3
Здравствуйте, Maxim.
Вы писали 21 июня 2007 г., 19:19:05:
M> Hi.
M> LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8
M> postgresql in UTF8
M> dbmail.conf:
M> encoding = utf8
M> default_msg_encoding = utf8
M> Mail client TheBat! 3.99.1
M> Mozilla Thunderbird 2.0.0.4
M> dbmail-pop3
. TheBat now do not show the majority of the title and why it does not open the old letters. Even in Outlook come what that crop instead of html content.
I do not think it's a problem just email programs. And I still can not find the cause of these errors.
--
С уважением,
yes, I have done all the instructions, including the upgrade to version 3.1..0
Вы писали 23 июля 2013 г., 22:11:07:
> Am 23.07.2013 19:23, schrieb Maxim:
>> after upgrading to 3.0.2 under debian 7, I had a lot of problems with imap
>> boxes. I can not find the pattern. Many
>
used - minus passwords, etc.
Finally, include a level 511 debug log (file_logging_level=511). Use
dbmail-deliver to insert a message that typically generates problems.
And include the test-message as well.
On 07/23/2013 07:23 PM, Maxim wrote:
hello,
after upgrading to 3.0.2 under debian 7, I had
hi,
When will version 3.1.2?
26.07.13 18:51, Paul J Stevens пишет:
On 26-07-13 15:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
* POP3 message damage
* IMAP: remove redundant logging during STORE
* hopefully we can debug the SQL syntax error from Sergej too
All three fixed now.
i have seen no SQL errors in a
hello,
can show sql database relationship model for version 3.x?
After a hard drive failure I have destroyed relations to the tables. I want to
bring everything back to normal.
The site has a scheme for version 2.x
--
С уважением,
Maxim mailto:max_c...@e-foto.ru
happens when I delete the cache in a large imap folder and try to
re-download the message.
--
Maxim mailto:max_c...@e-foto.ru
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
a, sorry
dbmail 3.1.6
14.09.13 15:23, Maxim:
hi,
SMP Debian 3.2.46-1+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Message in syslog:
kernel: [ 1315.730257] pool[2999] general protection ip:7f6a9764a9e9
sp:7f6a88bf7b78 error:0 in libdbmail.so.0.0.0 [7f6a97611000+6b000]
and dbmail-imapd down.
Another error
Yes, I know.
14.09.13 15:32, Reindl Harald ?:
with "file_logging_levels = 511" you have a*very very* fast growing log-*file*
on Fedora /var/log/dbmail.err and not a flooded syslog because this would become
rate-controlled and most likely miss relevant informations
watch out have this set
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe0060700 (LWP 8750)]
0x76cd5493 in g_list_last () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
14.09.13 15:51, Paul J Stevens пишет:
gdb src/dbmail-imapd
___
D
I do not have time right now, a little later
14.09.13 16:19, Paul J Stevens пишет:
On 09/14/2013 02:13 PM, Maxim wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe0060700 (LWP 8750)]
0x76cd5493 in g_list_last () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib
()
14.09.13 16:19, Paul J Stevens пишет:
On 09/14/2013 02:13 PM, Maxim wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe0060700 (LWP 8750)]
0x76cd5493 in g_list_last () from
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
this is not enough. Please provide a
me the message?
> On 09/14/2013 11:00 PM, Maxim wrote:
>>
>> this?
>>
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0x76cd5493 in g_list_last () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
>> #1 0x76cd552e in g_list_append () from
>> /
Здравствуйте, Maxim.
Вы писали 19 сентября 2013 г., 0:31:24:
> hi,
> but how do I find the problematic message?
> Вы писали 15 сентября 2013 г., 16:27:19:
>> I don't see anything obviously wrong here without doing a drill-down on
>> the backtrace. Can you provide s
3.1.7.tar.gz
> http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/snapshot/dbmail-3.1.7.tar.gz
> http://github.com/pjstevns/dbmail/archive/v3.1.7.tar.gz
> changelog:
> http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/log/?id=v3.1.7
--
С уважением,
Maxim mailto:max_c...@e-foto.ru
I have the same problem.
service is stopped for unknown reasons. impossible to track down the
problem, all is well in the journal
09.10.13 13:32, Harald Leithner пишет:
Hi Paul,
is there anyway to downgrade 3.1.17 to 2.2.18 ? My current 3.1.7
(including 06787d0866) is unresponsive able mult
i use next code in init scripts
if [ ! -d /var/run/dbmail ]; then
mkdir /var/run/dbmail
chown $USER.$GROUP /var/run/dbmail
fi
09.01.14 18:51, Reindl Harald ?:
Am 09.01.2014 15:38, schrieb Ken Drummond:
thanks for mai
]: [0x7fd46744b050] Error:[imap]
_do_fetch(+1182): [0x7fd43d0e80c0] _fetch_get_items returned with error
Jan 14 11:38:27 mail2 dbmail-imapd[26044]: [0x7fd46741fa00]
Debug:[MailboxState] db_getmailbox_seq(+693): id: [20] name: [INBOX] seq
[9644]
--
Maxim
___
DBmail
300,000 lines.
correctly that it is possible to delete all rows from dbmail_headervalue do not have relation to dbmail_header?
I think that one transaction it will be faster than the dbmail-util.
--
С уважением,
Maxim mailto:max_c...@e-foto.ru
Hello,
system:
dbmail 3.1.17
Debian 7 with last updates
the last two days dbmail-imapd frequently falls, and the error log for
the following message:
> dbmail-imapd: dm_string.c:161: p_string_erase: Assertion `pos + len
<= S->used' failed.
it happens on several servers.
I tried t
very sad. :(
I really like the concept of using DBMS to work with mail. Even
Thunderbird uses SQLite to store mailbox data.
Store letters in the file system is the "Stone Age"
20.09.18 22:11, Reindl Harald пишет:
Am 20.09.18 um 18:31 schrieb Peter Smith:
Also, where is the latest most curr
which DBMS do you use?
05.10.18 14:52, Reindl Harald пишет:
that there is a invalid char in a header is one thing, but that dbmail
produces non-recovery errors in that case sucks
<147609553.1537264268556.JavaMail.ýkids2@oekids-server>
"<75106708.5820290.1537266387...@mail.yahoo.com>")]
Oct 05
major bug and I am tired of turn on debug logging to get the fucking physical
ID for delete the record (and so the whole) message by hand after all that years
Am 5. Oktober 2018 21:09:28 MESZ schrieb Maxim :
which DBMS do you use?
05.10.18 14:52, Reindl Harald пишет:
that there is a invalid
This is the only server that works with DBMS to store all data. I think
this is a very good decision.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://lists.nfg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
At start of the program:
[xxx]# /etc/init.d/dbmail-imapd start
Starting DBMail IMAP daemon (dbmail-imapd) ... dbmail-imapd: Symbol
`_db_params' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
done.
[xxx]#
What does it mean?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Symbo
Hello,
Help to understand a problem please:
../configure --prefix=/usr \
--exec-prefix=/usr \
--disable-dependency-tracking \
--with-sieve \
--with-zdb=/usr/local \
make
libtool: link: gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr
Jorge Bastos wrote:
>
>> ...libs/dbmail-deliver main.o -Wl,--export-dynamic -lcrypt
>> -L/usr/local/lib/zdb -lgmime-2.4 -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -
>> lglib-2.0
>> -lm -lmhash -levent -lssl /usr/local/lib/libzdb.so ./.libs/libdbmail.so
>> -pthread -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpat
great! ok! :)
many thanks
I read, what during week-end it is expected final release, it is valid so?
Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
>
> Maxim,
>
> Please pull from my tree. I believe
>
> http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/commit/?id=01547f3668865835c46cabf021f1c59805c435
only on this bag, or on all? :)
Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
> On 01/29/2012 07:56 PM, Maxim Z. wrote:
>>
>> great! ok! :)
>> many thanks
>>
>> I read, what during week-end it is expected final release, it is valid
>> so?
>
>
hello,
> dbmail.conf
effective_user= mail
effective_group = mail
dbmail-pop3d it is launched only from mail user
There is no main process from root
It is an start-script error?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/dbmail-daemons-not-run-from-under-r
for test, manual run:
root# dbmail-pop3d -f /etc/dbmail.conf -p /var/run/dbmail-pop3d.pid -v
messages in dbmail.log:
[0x7b6f50] EMERGENCY:[pidfile] pidfile_create(+113): Cannot open pidfile
[/var/run/dbmail-pop3d.pid], error was [Permission denied]
But I running the daemon from root.
Pau
0 Jan27 ?00:00:13 /usr/sbin/dbmail-pop3d
mail 31294 18173 0 14:55 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/dbmail-pop3d
root 32368 18563 0 16:17 pts/100:00:00 grep dbmail-pop
Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
> On 01/31/2012 11:01 AM, Maxim Z. wrote:
>
> Privileges are dropped as soo
ok
many thanks
Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
> On 01/31/2012 01:21 PM, Maxim Z. wrote:
>>
>> Yes, correctly, so works.
>> But earlier the first process was launched from root, and others from a
>> mail.
>
> Correct. In 2.2 dbmail used a preforking server ar
39 matches
Mail list logo
