Robert L. Tom wrote:
What is the syntax in mbox2dbmail utility?
Is it mbox2dbmail username mboxfilename ?
thanks,
Almost ;-)
"mbox2dbmail username < mboxfilename" or
"cat mboxfilename | mbox2dbmail username" or
"grepmail filter mboxfilename | mbox2dbmail username" .
I found it didn't w
Paul Stevens wrote:
Being unable to move back to postgres I had to sweat it out. Not so much
it seemed: adding a sloth of indexes to the main tables solved all
performance issues I had. Using innodb I decided to add foreign key
contraints, and dbmail now feels very snappy indeed. Load now hover
Procmail has a wonderful little thing called "recipies" you can put in
.procmailrc.
Is there any similar functionality in dbmail-smtp?
--
Lost in Tokyo,
Keith
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Not sure if this is what you mean, but I use Redhat, and the default
sendmail config is to use procmail to do the local message delivery. So in
testing out dbmail, all I did was add to my procmail config file to use
procmail to deliver mail. A procmail entry that uses
This was really, really SLOW
Nov 21 00:07:15 hades dbmail/imap4d[4121]: COMMAND: [52 UID fetch 358907
(BODYSTRUCTURE)]
Nov 21 00:07:16 hades dbmail/imap4d[4121]: COMMAND: [53 UID fetch 358907
(BODY[HEADER] BODY[1.MIME] BODY[2.MIME] BODY[3.MIME] BODY[4.MIME] BODY[5.MIME])]
Nov 21 00:07:16 had
Roel Rozendaal - IC&S wrote:
could you test on a telnet session to the imap server executing these
commands manually and timing them?
While it did give me a crash course in IMAP command structure, but I wasn't
able to fetch by hand as quickly as Mozilla did.
--
Lost in Tokyo,
Keith
Bret Baptist wrote:
Can you try adding the -fomit-frame-pointers to your CFLAGS like described
below. Don't worry about the cpu flags.
-
On Friday 24 October 2003 5:35 am, Shih Ming-Wei wrote:
hi,
I have solve the 99% CPU usage on Linux/sparc systems that
we are using, apparent
Roel Rozendaal - IC&S wrote:
ok that was not a very smart question as the log shows the timing. Main
problem is that your client is requesting the message in chunks of
10240 bytes which does not speed up things; the commands self are
pretty fast (1 sec each). I've noticed this behaviour of s
Ross Gohlke wrote:
I envision a future in which an email client is nothing more than a
temporary repository for what's on the server, where average users take
advantage of IMAP and put their filters on the server. I think server-side
mail sorting would REALLY put DBMail ahead of the competition.
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hi,
I was going a grep throw the sources to find the sql that creates new
users but i didn't found nothing interesting.
Anyone give a hand?
Hi Jorge,
Look into auth/authsql.c (2.0.9) It starts "INSERT INTO dbmail_users"
--Keith
Guy Franckaert wrote:
Is there anyone that can help me?
The setup is,in my opinion, very simple but the different sources give
different setups and this is the most confusing part.
Situation :
POSTFIX is needed for incoming mail, scanning for viruses with
CLAMAVISD-NEW,spam control via Spamassa
Hi Ozgur,
Questions like this are best sent to the user's list, and not the developers list.
1) Add
dbmail-lmtp unix- - n - - lmtp
to master.cf,
2) start the dbmail-lmtp daemon
3) restart postfix.
See http://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?
Daniel Kasak wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have finally, *finally* gotten postfix and dbmail working on my
> desktop :) I can send mail and have it delivered into dbmail, and fetch
> the mail via imap from Thunderbird.
>
> I'm now following the instructions at:
> http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?
Hello,
I was trying to follow the SVN instructions on the DL page
(http://dbmail.org/index.php?page=download) to grab the latest on the 2_2
branch, but it didn't work for me.
It says "
For 2.2, which is in the dbmail_2_2_branch branch, the procedure is as follows:
$> svn checkout\
https:/
Tom Allison wrote:
>
> Thanks to all who replied. I think it's this canonical maps that makes
> the most sense to me. Also, I should probably change my usernames from
> fred to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I understand things correctly -- with this
> then allow me to use recipient validation in the pos
Guido Piazzi wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:32:14 -, Jorge Bastos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That is unix socket, but is in other field not in the host
>>
>> socket=.. if i remember
>
> It should be "sqlsocket", but by grepping the sources it seems to me it is
> used only in dbmysql.c,
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Freitag, 31. August 2007 Jorge Bastos wrote:
>> # saslauthd -v
>> saslauthd 2.1.22
>> authentication mechanisms: sasldb getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow
>> ldap
>
> I have this (standard openSUSE 10.2 modules):
> # saslauthd -v
> saslauthd 2.1.22
> authentication me
17 matches
Mail list logo
