Ilja Booij writes:
Does IMAP4 allow for "'" in the password? I can't find the valid
characters in the RFC (I might not be looking well enough).
IMAP allows all characters in the password, except null. The following
commands are all valid and log in with the two-character passwords ÿ½,
"\ and []
/dev/rob0 writes:
That's the part I don't know, but I've heard that connecting to a
socket differs from making a TCP connection to localhost.
(They're both sockets. There are many kinds of sockets, including TCP
sockets and unix-domain ones.)
Yes, there is a difference. A TCP connection to l
/dev/rob0 writes:
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 11:08, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Oh my heavens! A famous person! :) Did you know that you have been
immortalised in the /etc/hosts files of Slackware Linux?
Yes ;) People keep mentioning that. Hardly anyone notices e.g. 'man
mailaddr&
Micah Stevens schrieb:
Another example of government being silly IMHO..
Nah, the Germans are just being their logical selves. In Germany, if
your terms of service (Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen) say that you'll
store mail and not that you may delete it or filter in delivery, your
duties are t
Micah Stevens writes:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 05:42 am, Dominic Amann wrote:
Simon Lange wrote:
> in germany you must not delete mails from other users. the *only*
> solution would be to get an explicit permission per case by every
> individual user *before* deleting their trash folder.
Tommi Lätti writes:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Don't search. Searching and sorting is incomplete and only meant for SM.
And even then only for charset us-ascii.
Yes I figured out that already from reading this list for long time...
I was more like after solutions. Since I cannot find any settings
f
Jorge Bastos writes:
Hi in some emails i get a "" on the sender name like, "Jorge Bastos"
instead of Jorge Bastos ?
In the RFC 2822 syntax you're talking about, Jorge Bastos, "Jorge
Bastos", Jorge "Bastos", and "Jorge" Bastos are just different way of
expressing the same name, all legal, all
Jorge Bastos writes:
i'm not saying it was a bug or something, i just asked for curiusity
:P (sorry the bad english) i find it pretty indeed :P
Yes. And the answer:
From: "Arnt Gulbrandsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Different programs prefer to use different expressions
Alex writes:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
What do you mean. SM is just another imap client. Just as real as tb.
My point was that Thunderbird was rather more intelligent and didn't
trust IMAP on the dates. It downloaded all the headers and used the
date provided in the header of the mail. So in the
Don't beat up on Microsoft when you're on shaky ground ;) Before RFC
4551, there were just two strategies: Fetch all the flags repeatedly
and don't refetch them. Both suck.
If you refetch (as e.g. Opera does) you incur a regular O(n) cost, where
n is the number of messages in the mailbox. If y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oleg Lapshin wrote:
Users can modify scripts themselves and have additional rules in
sieve-scripts. So, there is 1 sieve-script per user and all of them
are different at all.
In that case indeed. Good luck with that.
This should be solvable without mechanical scrip
If I am permitted to speak a little: There are many factors which can
dominate wrt. this.
1. Memory bandwidth. Transferring 64-bit numbers/pointers from RAM to
CPU or the other way requires up to twice as much as 32-bit ones. "Up
to twice", because this also depends on how well the actual tran
Peter Rabbitson writes:
James Cloos wrote:
"Jani" == Jani Partanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jani> Every time when you hash something what is bigger than your
Jani> returned hash, there can be collision.
You still talking about one chance in on the order of 1.
Is this
Michael Monnerie writes:
I'm not sure about IMAP, I don't speak that protocol so can't tell
what to do in order to "fake" functionality.
Most IMAP clients expect to be able to access old mail.
Arnt
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://ma
Josh Marshall schrieb:
P.S. Just for interest's sake I wrote this really dodgy script. Put it
in inet for port 143. In Mozilla-thunderbird it gives no errors, just
nothing actually happens. Not sure what Outlook etc will do.
#!/bin/bash
echo "* OK imap maintenance ready"
sleep 2
echo "* CAPAB
Colin Wetherbee writes:
Marc Dirix wrote:
Your best way, is to get over the sendmail advantages, and start
using postfix.
It's been about eight years since I set up my first mail server, and
I've never heard anyone say sendmail has advantages over postfix.
I'll say it. Sendmail has advantag
Colin Wetherbee writes:
Hmm, Postfix has had support for 3461 since about 2005, in roughly
version 2.3.
Oh, fine. Is it complete? Does it pass on the ENVID to the next-hop MTA?
2852, no idea. Without reading the entire RFC, which I'm still too
sleepy to grok at the moment, I can't really com
Sim Zacks writes:
Archive Opteryx has a dbmail comparison from their perspective. Has
anyone used that system and is able to do a comparison from a dbmail
perspective?
That comparison is old and needs refreshing. Please do it; I'll update
the text next week (off for vacation now).
It looks
Sim Zacks writes:
> I haven't tried it yet, so my impression is based solely on the website.
>
> * DBMail has full POP support
> * DBMail Sieve is fully working
Aox too.
> * DBMail Works on multiple database engines
aox only on pgsql.
> * I didn't see anything about public/shared folders on the
Sim Zacks writes:
The website doesn't mention LDAP support either, but I suppose it
could just be assumed as well
Should be, perhaps. But it's not done yet. Please go on collecting items.
Arnt
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman
Jorge Bastos writes:
On SIDE A, will be the dbmail server (internal only), with just one
account being accessed by 20 users localy, that will synchronize with
a public dbmail that about 1000 accounts, but I just want to
synchronize that particular account. And it must be using a
synchronizatio
Jorge Bastos writes:
Imapsync works a bit wrong :S
At least with me, it creates a lot of duplicated messages...
You need to use the right options. I don't know what they are with
dbmail (I'm not a dbmail user).
Arnt
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@d
Marc Dirix writes:
Have you tried Mutt?
Mutt caches a lot of header fields. As soon as it opens a mailbox, it
reads all that stuff, no matter whether it'll need it. Opening my inbox
with mutt downloads about half a megabyte of header fields, and usually
just a few k of that is ever displayed
23 matches
Mail list logo
