[Dbmail] bad UIDNEXT

2012-03-14 Thread Emiliano Rago
Hi, I am trying to migrate my imap server to dbmail, and to do that I'd like to use "imapsync --useuid". I can't use the header as mechanism to synchronize, I have 700GB of stored messages and a lot of bad or inhexistent headers (so impasync would skip them). The problem is that dbmail don't

Re: [Dbmail] bad UIDNEXT

2012-03-14 Thread Paul J Stevens
On 03/14/2012 10:47 AM, Emiliano Rago wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to migrate my imap server to dbmail, and to do that I'd like > to use "imapsync --useuid". I can't use the header as mechanism to > synchronize, I have 700GB of stored messages and a lot of bad or > inhexistent headers (so impasync

[Dbmail] doing a clean 3.02 install

2012-03-14 Thread Jake Anderson
What OS should i use as the base. I'd like to use repos for the install, so no compiling. I'm a ubuntu/debian person myself so i think i'm half way there, I'm just wondering which particular version is going to be the most painless. ___ DBmail mailing

Re: [Dbmail] bad UIDNEXT

2012-03-14 Thread Emiliano Rago
On 03/14/2012 02:11 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote: The problem is that dbmail don't assign UID according to UIDNEXT prediction, so imapsync's cache is wrong, and if I rerun the synchronization the old messages and deleted and transferred again. So imapsync is broken! Look at this excerpt from RFC350

Re: [Dbmail] bad UIDNEXT

2012-03-14 Thread Paul J Stevens
On 03/14/2012 03:29 PM, Emiliano Rago wrote: > You're right, but there is any particular reason to not assign the UID > as predicted? There is no reason to. Message UIDs are the dbmail_messages.message_idnr value, an auto-incremented counter shared by *all* mailboxes for *all* users. -- ___