[Dbmail] I don't get the POSTMASTER mails

2005-09-06 Thread Leonel Nunez
Hello I've upgraded from 1.2.11 to 2.0.6 and now to 2.0.7 and since upgrade I don't get the bounced mails to postmastar or mail-daemon ( the mails with errors ) this is from my logs Sep 5 22:06:19 debian dbmail/smtp[732]: GetConfigValue(): NULL item value in item-list Sep

Re: [Dbmail] I don't get the POSTMASTER mails

2005-09-06 Thread Paul J Stevens
This looks like a level 3 or 4 trace. Could you please provide a level 5 trace? Did you do as suggested: run dbmail-utils -ay? Leonel Nunez wrote: > > > Hello > I've upgraded from 1.2.11 to 2.0.6 and now to 2.0.7 and since > upgrade I don't get the bounced mails to postmastar or mail-da

Re: [Dbmail] I don't get the POSTMASTER mails

2005-09-06 Thread Leonel Nunez
Paul J Stevens wrote: This looks like a level 3 or 4 trace. Could you please provide a level 5 trace? Did you do as suggested: run dbmail-utils -ay? yes I did here is the level 5 for the smtp I'm using PostgreSQL 8.0.3 Sep 6 06:18:36 debian dbmail/smtp[1886]: dbpgsql.c,db_query

Re: [Dbmail] I don't get the POSTMASTER mails

2005-09-06 Thread Paul J Stevens
Leonel Nunez wrote: > Sep 6 06:18:36 debian dbmail/smtp[1886]: dbpgsql.c,db_query: executing > query [INSERT INTO dbmail_messageblks (is_header, messageblk, blocksize, > physmessage_id) VALUES ('1','Received: from CHANGED (debian [127.0.0.1]) > ^Iby CHANGED (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A966601FD;

Re: [Dbmail] I don't get the POSTMASTER mails

2005-09-06 Thread Leonel Nunez
Paul J Stevens wrote: Leonel Nunez wrote: Sep 6 06:18:36 debian dbmail/smtp[1886]: dbpgsql.c,db_query: executing query [INSERT INTO dbmail_messageblks (is_header, messageblk, blocksize, physmessage_id) VALUES ('1','Received: from CHANGED (debian [127.0.0.1]) ^Iby CHANGED (Postfix) with E

Re: [Dbmail] Vulnerability in dbmail-pop3d version 1.2.11?

2005-09-06 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, I did a brief overview of 1.2.x dbmail pop3 code once looking for that sort of thing; I'm not a C expert, but from what I saw I don't think there was a problem. Iirc, dbmail actually caught and handled the extra length fine, it just chose to drop the pop3 connection on that invalid input

Re: [Dbmail] Vulnerability in dbmail-pop3d version 1.2.11?

2005-09-06 Thread Jesse Norell
> So yes! All you 1.2 users (you too, Jesse) better start thinking about > upgrading. Yeah, we're thinking about it. Hopefully we'll be able to go right to 2.2.x, by the time we actually get around to it. :) -- Jesse Norell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kentec Communications, Inc.