> Danil V. Gerun wrote:
I will update DBMail! Even right now probably...
oh, great.. the FreeBSD port is old.. will have to `hack' the port
system again...
DBMail 2.0.6 compiles cleanly against FreeBSD 5.4/6.0(BETA) with both MySQL and PgSQL, the port has
not been updated because of the cur
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Humberto Valiente wrote:
Hello Paul
Exist information about how to sync dbmail with and ldap (openldap)
addressbook??
Define sync please. What is it you're trying to do?
I looked in the wiki but the information there is only for ldap
authentication support
I also use Exim 4, yesterday I updated my DBMail installation to 2.0.6
(I downloaded 2.0.6.tgz from the site and only used it), and some errors
started appearing...
First - there were bugs with marking messages as read. After marking as
read - if I reenter the IMAP-folder the read message was
Hello,
> command = /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -d ${local_part} "${if
> def:h_x-spam-flag:{-mSpam}{} }"
> ling list Dbmail@dbmail.org https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
I don't use -m, and didn't test this, but it seems from
memory you have to use -u, not -d, with -m specifying
command = /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -d ${local_part} "${if
def:h_x-spam-flag:{-mSpam}{} }"
ling list Dbmail@dbmail.org https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
I don't use -m, and didn't test this, but it seems from
memory you have to use -u, not -d, with -m specifying a mail
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 21:54 +0400, Danil V. Gerun wrote:
> >>command = /usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp -d ${local_part} "${if
> >>def:h_x-spam-flag:{-mSpam}{} }"
> >>ling list Dbmail@dbmail.org
> >>https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I don't use -m, and didn't tes
Interesting. It's nice (if) it can work with either; I don't
think it used to. We're still running 1.2 :)
Well, as far as I remember, I was rather glad about this migrating to
2.0.x ;-)
--
Best regards,
Danil V. Gerun.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hi,
Just installed dbmail 2.0.x, latest from site..
I noticed that dbmail-users doesn't index the mailboxes to the userid
properly.
Is this managed by the foreign key restraint somehow? It always points to
some huge owner_idnr that doesn't exist anywhere. I can't tell what I'm
doing wrong..
