[Dbmail] Re: Anyone interested in SPF for their Postfix/DbMail Setup?

2004-10-08 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Mike, Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 um 03:16 schriebst du: > FYI: > Anyone interested in enabling SPF (plus MS CALLER-ID if desired) for > their Postfix MTA / DbMail system? > This is not intended as a recommendation but if you have considered > implementing the new SPF I have been running

[Dbmail] Anyone interested in SPF for their Postfix/DbMail Setup?

2004-10-08 Thread mike
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hallo Mike, Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 um 03:16 schriebst du: >>FYI: Anyone interested in enabling SPF (plus MS CALLER-ID if desired) for their Postfix MTA / DbMail system? This is not intended as a recommendation but if you have considered impleme

Re: [Dbmail] Anyone interested in SPF for their Postfix/DbMail Setup?

2004-10-08 Thread Ilja Booij
> > "This is not intended as a recommendation but if you have considered > implementing the new SPF I have been running the Postfix SMTP policy > daemon with Postfix/DbMail with good result." > > best... > Mike Hi Mike, wouldn't SPF break DBMail's forwarding system, or is that taken care of 'un

Re: [Dbmail] Anyone interested in SPF for their Postfix/DbMail Setup?

2004-10-08 Thread sahf
SPF is NOT designed to prevent spam, that's a common misconception. SPF is designed to ensure user authenticity, which it does rather well. Does it prevent things like DNS spoofing to get around it? No, but as the DNS spoofing would need to occur at every mail server period for it to be effective,

Re: [Dbmail] Anyone interested in SPF for their Postfix/DbMail Setup?

2004-10-08 Thread mike
Ilja Booij wrote: "This is not intended as a recommendation but if you have considered implementing the new SPF I have been running the Postfix SMTP policy daemon with Postfix/DbMail with good result." best... Mike Hi Mike, wouldn't SPF break DBMail's forwarding system, or is that taken