Ricardo Andere de Mello quilombodigital.org> writes:
>
> The same happens to me with 3500 messages.
> I really think this is related to caching in squirrelmail, but I didn't
> look at the code, so I can not confirm this.
>
> []s, gandhi
>
> Richard Houston wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I have a
Robert,
A DBMail native patch would indeed be sweet, but it seems that the root
of the problem is DBMail's lack of support for the Sort extension and
server-side threading.
Leif Jackson made a patch for the 2.0 series to support the Sort
extension. I'm unaware of any patches for the 1.x series.
Richard Barrington wrote:
A DBMail native patch would indeed be sweet, but it seems that the root
of the problem is DBMail's lack of support for the Sort extension and
server-side threading.
Leif Jackson made a patch for the 2.0 series to support the Sort
extension. I'm unaware of any patches fo
>foto3 and MP3
Password:
<>
Personally, I've found postfix to be the easiest to set up.
And if later you want to add virus protection and spam scanning,
it's basically a matter of adding 1 line to your postfix conf and
I think about 8 or so to one other postfix conf.
There are webpages all over you can basically cut and past
>fotoinfo
Password:
<>
Richard Barrington freedomwigs.com> writes:
>
> Robert,
>
> A DBMail native patch would indeed be sweet, but it seems that the root
> of the problem is DBMail's lack of support for the Sort extension and
> server-side threading.
>
> Leif Jackson made a patch for the 2.0 series to support the S
Hello, all - I found a way to bounce the virus-infected messages that
have been hitting this list over the past week from within Postfix. It
is actually a rather broad method - we're now blocking ALL messages
that include UPX-compressed executable files.
After noticing that a lot of virus and worm
Robert Tom wrote:
Richard Barrington freedomwigs.com> writes:
A DBMail native patch would indeed be sweet, but it seems that the root
of the problem is DBMail's lack of support for the Sort extension and
server-side threading.
So you mean that Dbmail with Sort extension and server-side thre
Thanks I just popped this in on my MTA, and it seems to be helping.
-Micah
On Friday 10 September 2004 08:51 am, Jeff Brenton wrote:
> /^TV..HA.J9x6ptYCMyAUFAI7YB...$
>/i
> /^jsD986X8LoBsEhBz55KvrQ4O..VQWCELAwMI$
>
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
The real issue here is that we are much better off in the long run if
DBMail is a really fast IMAP server. The development time required to
make SM natively access the DBMail database would be much better spent
adding the missing features to DBMail that make SM inef
Can you install a virus scanner? Clam Anti-Virus is successfully blocking
all of the virus-infected messages coming from this list on my MTA.
--
Alex Yamauchi
Access Innovations, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: (505) 265-3591, ext. 144
fax: (505) 256-1080
> Hello, all - I found a way
AY> Can you install a virus scanner? Clam Anti-Virus is successfully
AY> blocking all of the virus-infected messages coming from this list
AY> on my MTA.
A general virus scanner is in the works for our system, but it will
require that we accept the mail prior to scanning it. I'd rather NOT
accept
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 01:21:17PM -0500, Jeff Brenton wrote:
> AY> Can you install a virus scanner? Clam Anti-Virus is successfully
> AY> blocking all of the virus-infected messages coming from this list
> AY> on my MTA.
>
> A general virus scanner is in the works for our system, but it will
> re
Jeff Brenton wrote:
With forged return addresses, accept-analyze-bounce allows the virus
or worm to spread to the unfortunate person whose return address was
forged (Micah, in this case), only it now "originates" from "our"
server, instead of the infected machine.
Bouncing caught virusses, if
Hello Paul,
>> If you program the MTA to accept-analyze-drop messages, you risk a
>> false positive not being noticed; if the MTA rejects a legitimate
>> message, the sender will not get a report about the error.
PJS> What risk of false positives wrt virus-scanning? Are
PJS> virus-scanner so unre
Jeff Brenton wrote:
Hello Paul,
If you program the MTA to accept-analyze-drop messages, you risk a
false positive not being noticed; if the MTA rejects a legitimate
message, the sender will not get a report about the error.
PJS> What risk of false positives wrt virus-scanning? Are
PJS> vi
17 matches
Mail list logo
