> A few questions,
> - What should the table structure be?
> - What about automatic rebuilding the table cache, if you get a
> query for a new header?
If you change the syntax, then as Jesse pointed out, dbmail-maintenance
would be a logical place. Failing that, based on the lifetime of most emai
On 12/5/03 5:56 PM, "Mark Mackay - Orcon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One other note -- I don't think everyone wants the header cache. A lot of
> people are using IMAP webmail clients, and unless dbmail itself can benefit
> from such a cache, I'd suggest it's a compile-time option. No processing
