This bug hit me as well. I got around it through writing my own
conversion software that does set the internal date.
A bug has been logged on this issue though, and the guys at IC&S will
give me the code layout info I need to be able to fix it very soon.
Chris
Jeroen Hendriks wrote:
Hi,
W
I'm running a Debian Woody system.
My MTA is Postfix 1.1.11 as shipped with debian woody.
My DB back-end is PostgreSQL 7.2.1, but I also have tried with a
home-made-compilation of 7.3.2, getting the same problem.
I'm using DBMail 1.1, and I followed the config params of the INSTALL
file alm
I have over 3000 users 18000 emails on a uwimap server
(2 pentiums II 266mhz 512meg memory)
I migrate my users and email to a dbmail/innodb mysql server
(2 pentiums III 550mhz xeon 1024meg memory)
I get a drop in performance ?
A webmail query on uwimap took 1 seconde
A webmail query on dbmail
You would do well to look back in the archives and find the appropriate
set of indices to add into the database. My system's performance increased
dramatically by adding a few well places indices!
Aaron
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have over 3000 users 18000 emails on a uwim
Aaron Stone wrote:
You would do well to look back in the archives and find the appropriate
set of indices to add into the database. My system's performance increased
dramatically by adding a few well places indices!
Here's the README.Debian contained in the debian packages.
dbmail for Debia
Could these indices (or index) be added to the dbmail install in the cvs
Jacques
Aaron Stone a écrit :
> You would do well to look back in the archives and find the appropriate
> set of indices to add into the database. My system's performance increased
> dramatically by adding a few well places
Why are all thoses mysql indexes not created in
the dbmail cvs package
Jacques
Paul Stevens a écrit :
> Aaron Stone wrote:
> > You would do well to look back in the archives and find the appropriate
> > set of indices to add into the database. My system's performance increased
> > dramatically b
I applied these to my dbmail 1.1 mysql database..
Optimizing your tables
-
I found dbmail to become increasingly useless without additional
indexes. Speed increases as dramatically as server load drops
after adding these.
mysql:
alter table mailboxes add index (name);
alter
On 4/28/2003, "Robert L. Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I applied these to my dbmail 1.1 mysql database..
>
>Optimizing your tables
>-
>
>
>
>I found dbmail to become increasingly useless without additional
>indexes. Speed increases as dramatically as server load drops
>after a
Hi,
It is on the roadmap that has been discussed earlier this month
/Magnus
http://mailman.fastxs.net/pipermail/dbmail/2003-April/002662.html
Jacques Beaudoin wrote:
Why are all thoses mysql indexes not created in
the dbmail cvs package
Jacques
Paul Stevens a écrit :
Aaron Stone wrote:
Robert,
Robert L. Tom wrote:
I applied these to my dbmail 1.1 mysql database..
alter table messages add index (unique_id); <--Got an ERROR right here
alter table messages add index (status); <-- also here.
But I got an error on the last two lines from mysql saying they
don't exists!
Hi all,
I was thinking about building a dedicated smtp server for dbmail. This
will not be a full smtp server implementation (no relaying and stuff
like that) but pureley an smtp reception daemon. This has the following
advantages:
• much higher mail reception throughput
• direct
Right on Aaron
I just alter my dbmail tables and like you say:
> Speed increases as dramatically as server load drops
> after adding these.
>
> mysql:
>
> alter table mailboxes add index (name);
> alter table mailboxes add index (owner_idnr);
> alter table mailboxes add index (is_subscribed
13 matches
Mail list logo