[Dbmail] MySQL - mysqldump & MySQL replication

2003-03-26 Thread Chris Nolan
Hi all! I have two questions - please keep in mind that I am using InnoDB tables. 1. If I use "mysqldump --single-transation" to backup my DBMail database, will the result be a database that I can restore without any consistancy issues? I'm looking for a way to back everything up without having

[Dbmail] MySQL 4.0.12 stable and FreeBSD 4.7 & 5.0

2003-03-26 Thread Filip Wuytack
Hi All, Has anyone used dbmail on mysql 4.0.12 yet (4.0.12 was declared "production/stable" on 25/3)? Also, is the current dbmail cvs running well on FreeBSD 4.7 or 5.0? Thanks for any feedback, Filip

Re: [Dbmail] MySQL 4.0.12 stable and FreeBSD 4.7 & 5.0

2003-03-26 Thread Igor Olemskoi
> Has anyone used dbmail on mysql 4.0.12 yet (4.0.12 was declared > "production/stable" on 25/3)? > > Also, is the current dbmail cvs running well on FreeBSD 4.7 or 5.0? I'm running the current cvs on FreeBSD 4.7 (4.8PRE), it works fine.

Re: [Dbmail] postfix+dbmail+spamassassin+antivirus

2003-03-26 Thread lou
In some email I received from Gavin dunne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 25 Mar 2003 15:35:35 -0500, wrote: > I just wrote a little perl script that pipes email through > spamassassin and than files email away in specific folders > based on filters specified in a db table. > > There's no virus checking,

Re: [Dbmail] MySQL 4.0.12 stable and FreeBSD 4.7 & 5.0

2003-03-26 Thread Lou Kamenov
In some email I received from "Igor Olemskoi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 18:29:36 +0200 (EET), wrote: > > Has anyone used dbmail on mysql 4.0.12 yet (4.0.12 was declared > > "production/stable" on 25/3)? OT: I see you`re using mysql4.0.12, have you tried using it with openssl? > >

RE: [Dbmail] MySQL 4.0.12 stable and FreeBSD 4.7 & 5.0

2003-03-26 Thread Filip Wuytack
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lou Kamenov Sent: 26 March 2003 16:57 To: dbmail@dbmail.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Filip Wuytack Subject: Re: [Dbmail] MySQL 4.0.12 stable and FreeBSD 4.7 & 5.0 In some email I received from "Igor Olemskoi"

[Dbmail] redundancy patch

2003-03-26 Thread lou
Ello group{s}, some time ago i mentioned something about having a fallback database in case the first one doesnt respond. I found it really usefull in the following scenario. I have domain.com and two MX records for it mx1.domain.com(5) and mx2.domain.com(10), and i`m using dbmail, let say the

[Dbmail] dbmail-imapd cpu loop

2003-03-26 Thread Blake
Hello All, I've run across my first case of the tight looping problem in dbmail-imapd today. I am running dbmail 1.1 with Jesse's big patch from a few days back. Here's the appropriate slice of my process table: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS STAT START TIME COMMAND root 31160 0.0 0.1 3

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-imapd cpu loop

2003-03-26 Thread lou
In some email I received from Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:06:19 -0800, wrote: > Hello All, > > I've run across my first case of the tight looping problem in > dbmail-imapd today. I am running dbmail 1.1 with Jesse's big patch from > a few days back. Here's the appropriate