Hi all!
I have two questions - please keep in mind that I am using InnoDB tables.
1. If I use "mysqldump --single-transation" to backup my DBMail database, will
the result be a database that I can restore without any consistancy issues?
I'm looking for a way to back everything up without having
Hi All,
Has anyone used dbmail on mysql 4.0.12 yet (4.0.12 was declared
"production/stable" on 25/3)?
Also, is the current dbmail cvs running well on FreeBSD 4.7 or 5.0?
Thanks for any feedback,
Filip
> Has anyone used dbmail on mysql 4.0.12 yet (4.0.12 was declared
> "production/stable" on 25/3)?
>
> Also, is the current dbmail cvs running well on FreeBSD 4.7 or 5.0?
I'm running the current cvs on FreeBSD 4.7 (4.8PRE), it works fine.
In some email I received from Gavin dunne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 25 Mar 2003
15:35:35
-0500, wrote:
> I just wrote a little perl script that pipes email through
> spamassassin and than files email away in specific folders
> based on filters specified in a db table.
>
> There's no virus checking,
In some email I received from "Igor Olemskoi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26
Mar 2003 18:29:36
+0200 (EET), wrote:
> > Has anyone used dbmail on mysql 4.0.12 yet (4.0.12 was declared
> > "production/stable" on 25/3)?
OT: I see you`re using mysql4.0.12, have you tried using it with openssl?
> >
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Lou Kamenov
Sent: 26 March 2003 16:57
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Filip Wuytack
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] MySQL 4.0.12 stable and FreeBSD 4.7 & 5.0
In some email I received from "Igor Olemskoi"
Ello group{s},
some time ago i mentioned something about having a fallback database in
case the first one doesnt respond. I found it really usefull in the following
scenario.
I have domain.com and two MX records for it mx1.domain.com(5) and
mx2.domain.com(10),
and i`m using dbmail, let say the
Hello All,
I've run across my first case of the tight looping problem in
dbmail-imapd today. I am running dbmail 1.1 with Jesse's big patch from
a few days back. Here's the appropriate slice of my process table:
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 31160 0.0 0.1 3
In some email I received from Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Mar 2003
12:06:19
-0800, wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've run across my first case of the tight looping problem in
> dbmail-imapd today. I am running dbmail 1.1 with Jesse's big patch from
> a few days back. Here's the appropriate