[Dbmail] Infrastructure for LDAP: auth_connect calls

2003-02-02 Thread Aaron Stone
In the coming release, I'd very much appreciate if more calls to auth_connect() were added to parallel calls to db_connect(). Here's a quick grep of today's CVS to show which files need the added calls: [EMAIL PROTECTED] dbmail]$ grep auth_connect * auth.h:int auth_connect(); injector.c: if (db_c

Re: [Dbmail] Infrastructure for LDAP: auth_connect calls

2003-02-02 Thread
hmm, i think auth* calls that are used by db* calls should be implemented in db.h. i.e: int auth_connect () { return (db_connect()); } Don't shoot me on the prototype, it's just an example. Eelco On zondag, feb 2, 2003, at 03:01 Europe/Amsterdam, Aaron Stone wrote: In the coming r

Re: [Dbmail] pop3d :(

2003-02-02 Thread
Are you sure you have the latest CVS? What exactly are you doing? I can't seem to reproduce the problem.. Eelco On zaterdag, feb 1, 2003, at 23:25 Europe/Amsterdam, Igor Olemskoi wrote: I have installed the latest CVS: Feb 2 00:22:52 sumy dbmail/pop3d[11169]: pop3(): user tourov logged i

Re: [Dbmail] pop3d :(

2003-02-02 Thread
Problem is located and fixed. Happends when logging in while there is no new mail. Because there is a new session structure i needed to set the starting values to 0 :) Please keep on testing! Eelco On zondag, feb 2, 2003, at 11:59 Europe/Amsterdam, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote: Are you su

Re: [Dbmail] Infrastructure for LDAP: auth_connect calls

2003-02-02 Thread Aaron Stone
Yes, this would work well, but I believe there were a few posts which Roel responded to a while back regarding a split of auth and storage databases. For example, if someone already had a big mysql user base, but wanted to store their messages in posgres? Aaron On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Eelco van Beek

Re: [Dbmail] Infrastructure for LDAP: auth_connect calls

2003-02-02 Thread Aaron Stone
Oh, wait, it's no good unless db_connect() also gets more connection handling smart, because essentially it would be writing this: db_connect(); db_connect(); Which would leak the first a connection into thin air! Aaron On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Aaron Stone wrote: > Yes, this would work well, but I