Are you using procmail to deliver the messages to dbmail? I found that
procmail added an aditional line to the message which made the from address
column be a time.. I wrote a simple wrapper which deletes the first line
and then pipes it through to dbmail-smtp which seemed to fix it.
/Mark
On 7
As an easy but extremely helpful feature, what about changing the
deletedflag to be a unix timestamp (or similar). This would allow the
maintenance script, etc to be modified in the future to delete messages that
have been deleted after they've been flagged for deletion for over 72 hours,
as an ex
No, mail is delevered through Exim via a pipe in the aliases file. I create
all aliases for each domain so mail is not accepted if the user does not
exist.
When I look into the header of the messages (looking from top to bottom),
the numbers appear to be the minutes and seconds shown in the last
On Tuesday 06 August 2002 10:02 am, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 08:19 6/08/2002 -0500, Bret Baptist wrote:
> >On Tuesday 06 August 2002 04:02 am, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
> > > No, it is not possible to use a sequence. The unique id field should
> > > have a fixed size.
> > >
> > > But i'm sure R
dbmail@dbmail.org writes:
>Has anyone been able to come up with a way to get rid of all the
>duplicate
>unique_id #s? I have a lot of email with dupes and I need to get them
>all
>fixed as soon as possible. Any ideas how to do that without going
>through by
>hand? Thank you very much.
trymysq
On Wednesday 07 August 2002 09:10 am, Wulff D. Heiss wrote:
> dbmail@dbmail.org writes:
> >Has anyone been able to come up with a way to get rid of all the
> >duplicate
> >unique_id #s? I have a lot of email with dupes and I need to get them
> >all
> >fixed as soon as possible. Any ideas how to d
At 08:45 7/08/2002 -0500, Bret Baptist wrote:
Has anyone been able to come up with a way to get rid of all the duplicate
unique_id #s? I have a lot of email with dupes and I need to get them all
fixed as soon as possible. Any ideas how to do that without going through by
hand? Thank you very m
