Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-26 Thread Reindl Harald
il.org] On >> Behalf Of Reindl Harald >> Sent: quinta-feira, 24 de Julho de 2014 21:31 >> To: dbmail@dbmail.org >> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 >> last clean version >> >> yes! >> >> [root@mail:~]$ rp

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-25 Thread Paul J Stevens
> want a version the most stable possible, > >> -Original Message- >> From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On >> Behalf Of Reindl Harald >> Sent: quinta-feira, 24 de Julho de 2014 21:31 >> To: dbmail@dbmail.org >> Subject

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On > Behalf Of Reindl Harald > Sent: quinta-feira, 24 de Julho de 2014 21:31 > To: dbmail@dbmail.org > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 > last clean version > > yes! > > [root

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-24 Thread Reindl Harald
, problem solved? > >> -Original Message- >> From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On >> Behalf Of Harald Leithner >> Sent: terça-feira, 22 de Julho de 2014 08:39 >> To: DBMail mailinglist >> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-24 Thread Jorge Bastos
COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 > last clean version > > Runs fine for me, no customer complains since yesterday \o/ > > > Am .07.2014, 17:56 Uhr, schrieb Paul J Stevens : > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > So, y

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-22 Thread Harald Leithner
Runs fine for me, no customer complains since yesterday \o/ Am .07.2014, 17:56 Uhr, schrieb Paul J Stevens : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So, you think we're ready for 3.1.17? On 21-07-14 17:10, Reindl Harald wrote: "69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c" looks way bette

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Reindl Harald (mobile)
e: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So, you think we're ready for 3.1.17? On 21-07-14 17:10, Reindl Harald wrote: > "69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c" looks way better > > *

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Paul J Stevens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So, you think we're ready for 3.1.17? On 21-07-14 17:10, Reindl Harald wrote: > "69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c" looks way better > > * high concurrency * loop of 3000 times "Panel: E-Mail-Debug - > IMAP-POP3-Download" with POP3 and IMAP wi

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Reindl Harald
"69c0592867ad012bd1b78b873b65f7e53064971c" looks way better * high concurrency * loop of 3000 times "Panel: E-Mail-Debug - IMAP-POP3-Download" with POP3 and IMAP with no mismatch between both * checksum of all testmessages for POP3 and IMAP correct * see also attachment not sure if the conlusio

Re: [Dbmail] GUILTY COMMIT FOUND -> Re: re-construct: 3.1.10 last clean version

2014-07-21 Thread Paul J Stevens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok. I'm putting gmime back in charge of parsing for boundaries. Currently testing the change. On 21-07-14 15:42, Reindl Harald wrote: > > CLEAN - snapshot: a3f2972ed0f3f4d16fed27418c2013c6094533ab.tar.bz2 > _