Another option is to setup a wiki so that the entire dbmail community
can easily collaberate on developing comprehensive documentation.
PhpWiki (PHP): http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/
TWiki (Perl): http://twiki.org/
jbw
Micah Stevens wrote:
I think this is a fine idea, I have quite a
I think this is a fine idea, I have quite a bit of experience with building
PDF's on the fly with PHP. If this documentation is maintained in a database,
casual surfers could peruse an HTML version, and a current PDF version could
be generated with largely the same code on the spot.
I'd be wil
: [Dbmail] Documentation project for dbmail?
Sent: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:14:20 +0200
> Jesse Norell wrote:
> > Perhaps a dbmail-doc mailing list would be in order, also?
> >
> >
>
>
> The best documentation I have seen is the PHP online
> documentation, where user
Jesse Norell wrote:
Perhaps a dbmail-doc mailing list would be in order, also?
The best documentation I have seen is the PHP online
documentation, where users can post their comments on each
subject. We can in due time compile a howto document or something
similar, from the specific answe
Perhaps a dbmail-doc mailing list would be in order, also?
Original Message
From: Chris Nolan
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Documentation project for dbmail?
Sent: 18 Jun 2003 21:23:22 +1000
> I think we really need to plan this properly, with a general docum
In some email I received from Feargal Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 18 Jun
2003
13:04:53 +0100, wrote:
> And I forgot to say...
>
> In practical usage, there should be an open mailing list where anybody can
> send their
> two cents, which the maintainers subscribe to. Each will have their
And I forgot to say...
In practical usage, there should be an open mailing list where anybody can send
their two cents, which the maintainers subscribe to.
Each will have their own login, so should someone mail a typo in, any of the
maintainers can go in and fix it. A log of changes is kept, and
Unlike my clients (who love programs like ACT! and Outlook with reasons
I can't even begin to understand), I will happily be involved in this
regardless of the chosen language for the documentation (as long as no
one suggests Wordsuggest Word and I will inflict the hell of FoxPro
upon you!)
If
Since I started this thread, here's my thoughts.
Documentation is *always* the hardest thing to get people to do.
If somebody has decent coding ability, they'll prefer to contribute to a
project by fixing bugs, or adding features. (They will of course fail to
document these contributions too :)
In some email I received from Magnus Sundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 18 Jun
2003 13:26:14 +0200, wrote:
> lou wrote:
> > In some email I received from Roel Rozendaal - IC&S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
> > Wed, 18 Jun 2003
> > 12:17:08 +0200, wrote:
[...]
> > Any other ideas? Since we manage to ag
lou wrote:
In some email I received from Roel Rozendaal - IC&S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,
18 Jun 2003
12:17:08 +0200, wrote:
I think so, easy to update, and add automatically date automatically for the last update
also it's very simple.
I also think LaTeX.
Any other ideas? Since we man
I think we really need to plan this properly, with a general document
structure and a recognised maintainer. Additionally, deciding on what
sections will be included needs consideration.
Chris
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 20:28, lou wrote:
> In some email I received from Roel Rozendaal - IC&S <[EMAIL PR
In some email I received from Roel Rozendaal - IC&S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,
18 Jun 2003
12:17:08 +0200, wrote:
> very glad about these doc plans!
>
> dbmail.org is definitely the place to put these docs; cvs is fine with
> me, is it the way we want to do this?
I think so, easy to update, a
very glad about these doc plans!
dbmail.org is definitely the place to put these docs; cvs is fine with
me, is it the way we want to do this?
regards roel
lou heeft op dinsdag, 17 jun 2003 om 18:22 (Europe/Amsterdam) het
volgende geschreven:
In some email I received from Chris Nolan <[EMA
In some email I received from Chris Nolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 18 Jun
2003 02:05:48
+1000, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With regard to this, LaTeX is one of my pet tools and I have server
> space available for hosting this sort of thing if we want something
> other than the standard SourceForge
Hi all,
With regard to this, LaTeX is one of my pet tools and I have server
space available for hosting this sort of thing if we want something
other than the standard SourceForge setup. I'd like to be involved. I
wrote the tool Cyrus2DBMail (that everyone is sick of hearing about) and
have s
I will like to participate in a project like that. I´m have some good
papers for DBMail + Postfix + SASL + TSL that can easy create a great
solution.
> Hi all,
> I've just started playing with dbmail, and noticed a lack of friendly
> documentation. The man pages are pretty decent, but given the wi
In some email I received from Feargal Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 17 Jun
2003
13:23:42 +0100, wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've just started playing with dbmail, and noticed a lack of friendly
> documentation. The
> man pages are pretty decent, but given the wide range of possible
> implementation
Hi,
I've got about 50 pages of docs right now. About 30 more and i'll upload the
first draft.
Hope to have this done within a week or two.
First we have to fix some minor bugs with postgresql and daemon process
management.
Best regards,
Eelco
On 14-07-2002 16:42, "Morten Christensen" <[EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: "Bret Baptist" Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:18 PM
Subject: [Dbmail] Documentation
> Is there a place where I can download docs for the CVS
version right now? It
> would be nice to know how some of the new stuff works.
Thanks a ton.
I have tried to install the l
20 matches
Mail list logo
