Well then, problem solved!
For my situation, I do not want to allow unsecure connections, so the
separate port is the ideal solution. But for your situation stunnel
3.22, which is what I'm using, has native support for pop3 STLS
negotiations.
-n proto
Negotiate SSL with specif
Mitchell
> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 4:11 PM
> To: dbmail@dbmail.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Road map
>
> Richard,
>
> You can use stunnel for both imaps and pop3s. I have mine set to the
> following, for securer IMAP:
>
> stun
Are there any plans to have MAPI implemented in the future?
~ Filip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Blake Mitchell
Sent: 07 April 2003 00:11
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Road map
Richard,
You can
Richard,
You can use stunnel for both imaps and pop3s. I have mine set to the
following, for securer IMAP:
stunnel -p ./mail.pem -S 0 -t 3600 -d imaps -r localhost:imap -s ssl -g ssl
and for secure POP3:
stunnel -p ./mail.pem -S 0 -d pop3s -r localhost:pop3 -s ssl -g ssl
You can find info a
You've exactly described LMTP ;-) SMTP is the Simple Mail Transfer
Protocol... and LMTP is the Lightweight version thereof. What's nice is
that many MTA's already have built in support to "deliver" messages via
the LMTP protocol, which means less of the weird delivery agent configs.
imaps and pop3
Thanks Aaron.
All these all sound good.
On the LMTP point, what about adding persistent database connections to
the dbmail-smtp daemon? So have a dbmail-smtp daemon running and it
managing a connection pooling mechanism. Then have postfix or what ever
forward the messages to the daemon that wou
This is where the suggestions go! A web based feature/voting board
added to the website might be pretty neat, though ;-)
I'll see if I can give an overview of the ideas, though I'm sure I'll
forget a few important ones, and certainly believe that my suggestions are
more popular than they really
