On Monday 05 August 2002 04:32 pm, Dave Logan wrote:
> I think that what Bret is saying (from a technical aspect)
> is that the quotacheck shouldn't count messages with a status
> of "002" because this means they're deleted.
> I agree, but I thought this had been fixed already
> davel
I am run
I think that what Bret is saying (from a technical aspect)
is that the quotacheck shouldn't count messages with a status
of "002" because this means they're deleted.
I agree, but I thought this had been fixed already
davel
--
Dave Logan
"NO! Try not! Do. Or do not." -- Yoda
On Monday 05 August 2002 02:30 pm, Shane Kerr wrote:
>
> What is the reason you have a maxmail limit at all? If the purpose is
> to limit the ability of users to consume server resources, then it
> shouldn't matter whether the mail is deleted or not. Likewise, if you
> are charging users based on
On 2002-08-05 13:56:10 -0500, Bret Baptist wrote:
> Is there a reason that mail marked as deleted is included in the total
> maxmail limit a user can have in their mailboxes? I would think that
> when you check if a user is at the limit for how much mail they can
> have, that you would exclude mai
Is there a reason that mail marked as deleted is included in the total maxmail
limit a user can have in their mailboxes? I would think that when you check
if a user is at the limit for how much mail they can have, that you would
exclude mail marked for deletion from that total. I am wondering
