Re[6]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-07 Thread Boyan Alexiev
Hi Eelco, /usr/sbin/sendmail and working, yes no probs with ver 1.1 of dbmail! (once again) if the problem was with sendmail I think it would not matter what trace level I set :) I just hope this problem won't reappear in some next version like what happened with 1.0. Best regards, Bobby [EMAIL P

Re[5]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-07 Thread Boyan Alexiev
Hi Aaron, Yes, this is the line, but no, normally with level 5 the segfault does not show and everything works fine. I have commented many lines with DEBUG level to test what makes the segfault go away under level 5 and when I comment that line the segfault reappears even with level 5. So, when I

Re: Re[4]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-07 Thread
Is your sendmail in the right place and working? (/usr/bin/sendmail) Best regards, Eelco On donderdag, maa 6, 2003, at 19:11 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan Alexiev wrote: Hi Eelco, Thanks. I suppose you mean the signal 11 problem, so here are two cases, both with level 5, but they have some debu

Re[4]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-06 Thread Aaron Stone
Is this the line that you're talking about? trace (TRACE_DEBUG,"insert_messages(): alias deliver_to is [%s]", (char *)tmp->data); and if you comment this out, the segfault goes away? It may indicate that tmp->data is not allocated properly... Aaron On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Boyan

Re[4]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-06 Thread Boyan Alexiev
Hi Eelco, Thanks. I suppose you mean the signal 11 problem, so here are two cases, both with level 5, but they have some debug lines commented out. As it may sound very strange, the problem appears also on level 5 when I put a comment on line 276 in pipe.c Also the test shows that the problem appe

Re: Re[2]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-05 Thread
I could really use a trace level 5 on this. Do you have one available already? thanks a lot, Eelco On woensdag, maa 5, 2003, at 17:55 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan Alexiev wrote: Hi Eelco, It seems that the bug is definitely somewhere with the debug routine. However I just installed 1.1 and it s

Re: Re[2]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-05 Thread
Hi Bobby, I'm sure the problem is not in the debug routine :) The problem occurs in the debug routine because the debug routine tries to print a variable which isnt allocated or assigned. I'll look into it some more. Thanks, Eelco On woensdag, maa 5, 2003, at 17:55 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan A

Re[2]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-05 Thread Boyan Alexiev
Hi Eelco, It seems that the bug is definitely somewhere with the debug routine. However I just installed 1.1 and it seems the problem is solved. But there is still a problem, that I have not reported, regarding ReadConfig(): trace lines in config.c Although these are with TRACE_DEBUG the line appe

Re[2]: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-05 Thread Boyan Alexiev
Hi Eelco, Thanks for the answer. I think there is no use to send you any message, because this applies to all messages, that are sent to a so called "external alias" (external_forward). Let's say I have alias: [EMAIL PROTECTED] deliver_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then the result is: Mar 5 13:17:03 b

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-01 Thread
Hi Bobby, Could you sent me the e-mail message (full source, you can do that with the postcat command) that resulted in the sigsegv? Best regards, Eelco On vrijdag, feb 21, 2003, at 22:14 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan Alexiev wrote: Hello again guys! It seems I am having some problems with 1

[Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-02-21 Thread Boyan Alexiev
Hello again guys! It seems I am having some problems with 1.0 dbmail-smtp that are not unknown to you. And yes, I think this is related to messages being sent over and over again (which sadly many of you have noticed on this very list, which I apologize for). I am using Dbmail 1.0 official final s