RE: [Dbmail] a vote for libSieve

2004-07-16 Thread Ilja Booij
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 18:45, Simon Gray wrote: > Just out of curiosity is there any ETA on dbmail 2.0 being classed as > stable and libsieve being ready? ETA dbmail 2.0: I'll be on holiday for 2 weeks. Shortly after that (1 or 2 weeks) we'll release 2.0 LibSieve: This will take longer. Maybe Aaro

RE: [Dbmail] a vote for libSieve

2004-07-15 Thread Simon Gray
Just out of curiosity is there any ETA on dbmail 2.0 being classed as stable and libsieve being ready? Simon

Re: [Dbmail] a vote for libSieve

2004-07-15 Thread Keith Hopkins
Ross Gohlke wrote: I envision a future in which an email client is nothing more than a temporary repository for what's on the server, where average users take advantage of IMAP and put their filters on the server. I think server-side mail sorting would REALLY put DBMail ahead of the competition.

Re: [Dbmail] a vote for libSieve

2004-07-15 Thread Ilja Booij
Aaron Stone has done quite a lot of work on this already, and will continue to do so after the release of 2.0 :) Ilja Ross Gohlke wrote: I envision a future in which an email client is nothing more than a temporary repository for what's on the server, where average users take advantage of IMA

[Dbmail] a vote for libSieve

2004-07-15 Thread Ross Gohlke
I envision a future in which an email client is nothing more than a temporary repository for what's on the server, where average users take advantage of IMAP and put their filters on the server. I think server-side mail sorting would REALLY put DBMail ahead of the competition.