Re: [Dbmail] Pop locks

2002-09-25 Thread Mark Mackay
Definitely AGAINST provided it doesn't cause problems... Can't see any to date. Doesn't seem to screw up the second session, so all good! Pop locks cause so many hassles for our helpdesk when people get cut off mid session or the like. Yay for not needing to worry about it with dbmail! /Mark

Re: [Dbmail] Pop locks

2002-09-25 Thread Roel Rozendaal
D]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:24 AM Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Pop locks > > A message is marked for deletion immediatly but is not removed from the > database until the dbmail-maintenance routine is run. > > I've run concurrent session before. Unless a newer release has

Re: [Dbmail] Pop locks

2002-09-25 Thread Micah Stevens
A message is marked for deletion immediatly but is not removed from the database until the dbmail-maintenance routine is run. I've run concurrent session before. Unless a newer release has changed things, POP and IMAP both are capable of running concurrent user sessions. (with the same user)

[Dbmail] Pop locks

2002-09-24 Thread Mark Mackay
Just checking so I can brief our helpdesk, I'm assuming dbmail does not lock the pop sessions to prohibit the same user from relogging in while another session is active. >From my tests, it looks like any destructive change (eg deleting a message Status: O is honoured immediately upon a client ex