Thomas,
You don't need those files, and should install them either. They are
compiled into dbmail!
On 27-10-14 15:06, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
> Am 21.09.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Thomas Raschbacher:
>> On 2014-09-21 18:08, Paul J Stevens wrote:
>>> Fixed it. Silly mysql side-effects when re-using
Am 21.09.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Thomas Raschbacher:
> On 2014-09-21 18:08, Paul J Stevens wrote:
>> Fixed it. Silly mysql side-effects when re-using an open database
>> connection. Worked perfectly on postgres. Now both work by re-opening a
>> database connection while looping over the upgrade steps
On 2014-09-21 18:08, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Fixed it. Silly mysql side-effects when re-using an open database
connection. Worked perfectly on postgres. Now both work by re-opening a
database connection while looping over the upgrade steps.
Please test HEAD on the dbmail_3_2 branch, if you can and
Fixed it. Silly mysql side-effects when re-using an open database
connection. Worked perfectly on postgres. Now both work by re-opening a
database connection while looping over the upgrade steps.
Please test HEAD on the dbmail_3_2 branch, if you can and let me now if
it solves things.
http://git
Am 29.08.2014 18:40, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> Looks like there is a problem here. Will investigate asap.
>
> On 28-08-14 08:09, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I was just going to add 3.2.0 to the gentoo portage tree, but when
>> testing i got this error in my syslog:
>>
>> dbmail/imap4d[1
Am 29.08.2014 18:40, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
> Looks like there is a problem here. Will investigate asap.
>
Ok Thanks.
Please let us know when you found the problem. I will hold back adding
3.2.0 to the portage tree until then.
Regards
___
DBmail mail
> @Paul: what gmime version are you using wiht dbmail 3.2 at the moment? I
> would like to use 3.2 to introduce a dependency on a higher gmime
> version in Gentoo and since there have been problems with some versions
> before I thought I'd ask you which you recommend at the moment.
gmime-2.6.20
-
Looks like there is a problem here. Will investigate asap.
On 28-08-14 08:09, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was just going to add 3.2.0 to the gentoo portage tree, but when
> testing i got this error in my syslog:
>
> dbmail/imap4d[15315]: Error:[db] check_upgrade_step(+920): SQLExceptio
On 28-08-14 08:31, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
> I think I just noticed what is the problem:
> By default in gentoo all text files in /usr/share/doc/ are
> ..bz2
> Could it be that dbmail loads the sql migration scripts from there and
> expects "${DOCDIR}/sql/postgresql/upgrades/" to contain the f
Am 28.08.2014 um 08:31 schrieb Thomas Raschbacher:
> Am 28.08.2014 08:09, schrieb Thomas Raschbacher:
>> I was just going to add 3.2.0 to the gentoo portage tree, but when
>> testing i got this error in my syslog:
>>
>> dbmail/imap4d[15315]: Error:[db] check_upgrade_step(+920): SQLException:
>> FEH
Am 28.08.2014 08:09, schrieb Thomas Raschbacher:
> Hi.
>
> I was just going to add 3.2.0 to the gentoo portage tree, but when
> testing i got this error in my syslog:
>
> dbmail/imap4d[15315]: Error:[db] check_upgrade_step(+920): SQLException:
> FEHLER: Relation »dbmail_upgrade_steps« existiert
Hi.
I was just going to add 3.2.0 to the gentoo portage tree, but when
testing i got this error in my syslog:
dbmail/imap4d[15315]: Error:[db] check_upgrade_step(+920): SQLException:
FEHLER: Relation »dbmail_upgrade_steps« existiert nicht
LINE 1: SELECT 1=1 FROM dbmail_upgrade_steps WHERE from_v
Am 23.08.2014 15:30, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very happy to announce DBMail 3.2.0. Since it's been running
> stable and reliable in my own installation, it's time to cut a new
> stable branch, and tag it's first point release.
>
> 3.2.0 contains all the stability improvements
Hi Paul,
For 3.2.0, with a new account that just logged with MSOutlook, normally it
creates Drafts/Sent Items, it did but it the folders were created as
unsubscribed, with the other dbmail version that I have in production Drafts
& Sent Items are created as subscribed.
Is this a change in 3
Bastos; 'DBMail mailinglist'
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] DBMail 3.2.0 released
Jorge, either your clock is off, or mine is...
On 23 augustus 2014 15:39:36 CEST, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hi Paul,
Was testing this on my test machine, and get this:
checking whether build environment is sane
buted files!
>
>My fault?
>Auto* tools are latest.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
>> Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
>> Sent: sábado, 23 de Agosto de 2014 14:30
>> To: DBMail mailinglist
>
l-boun...@dbmail.org] On
> Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
> Sent: sábado, 23 de Agosto de 2014 14:30
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: [Dbmail] DBMail 3.2.0 released
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very happy to announ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm very happy to announce DBMail 3.2.0. Since it's been running
stable and reliable in my own installation, it's time to cut a new
stable branch, and tag it's first point release.
3.2.0 contains all the stability improvements done in 3.1 ov
18 matches
Mail list logo
