Jean-Luc,
> Unfortunately there was a new upgrade of binutils today on debian
> sid.
>
> It is from 2.51.20161105-2 -> 2.51.20161108-1
>
> And... the bug is here again.
Confirmed :( As you said it is sid so nothing to complaint about!
--
Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
The best w
So, I've added this information to my bug report...
J-L
2016-11-09 10:07 GMT+01:00 Pascal Obry :
>
> Jean-Luc,
>
> > Unfortunately there was a new upgrade of binutils today on debian
> > sid.
> >
> > It is from 2.51.20161105-2 -> 2.51.20161108-1
> >
> > And... the bug is here again.
>
> Confirme
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Sascha Oleszczuk wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> attached the updated script.
Oh, you modified the extract_wb from darktable-2.0.x branch?
Did you check beforehand whether the version in master branch works
for RAF's already?
> Sorry to mess up the pull request. First time
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Sascha Oleszczuk wrote:
> Hi Roman,
> attached the updated script.
OK!
It took some doing, but i was able to port it to the git master...
For future reference, please do understand that git master is the only
thing that matters, changes are done *only* in git maste
Ugh, and now that i have actually cheked, after pushing, the git master version
has *already* supported extracting info from these exact RAF's.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Sascha Oleszczuk wrote:
>> Hi Roman,
>
>> attached the updated sc
good point. Will check this tonight
Sascha
2016-11-09 11:11 GMT+01:00 Roman Lebedev :
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Sascha Oleszczuk
> wrote:
> > Hi Roman,
> >
> > attached the updated script.
> Oh, you modified the extract_wb from darktable-2.0.x branch?
> Did you check beforehand whether t
