Re: [darktable-dev] How to get profiled denoise data incorporated into Darktable?

2016-09-09 Thread Roman Lebedev
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Pete Hall wrote: > Hello Roman > > Sorry to get in at the end here, but I have a tarball that's been > getting ignored for quite a while too.Would you please tell me the > actual uri I need in order to create an issue in redmine? Tracker = "Camera Support" Subject

[darktable-dev] Photo export slower with OpenCL

2016-09-09 Thread Aurélien PIERRE
Hi, since Ubuntu 16.04, the processing and exporting with OpenCL felt much slower than before. I finally decided to benchmark exporting times with -d opencl - perf options and found out that OpenCL took 183 s to export a 36 Mpx file with the GPU instead of 35 s with the CPU. However, the outp

Re: [darktable-dev] How to get profiled denoise data incorporated into Darktable?

2016-09-09 Thread Pete Hall
Thank you Roman. That was what I needed. I've added your information to a blog posting that I wrote last May, detailing how a noise profile can be created in a manner that may be slightly more intelligible to those of us who are slightly computer deficient. It's at https://landscrapes.wordpress.co

Re: [darktable-dev] How to get profiled denoise data incorporated into Darktable?

2016-09-09 Thread Roman Lebedev
"DarkTable" ? :) It's darktable On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Pete Hall wrote: > Thank you Roman. That was what I needed. > > I've added your information to a blog posting that I wrote last May, > detailing how a noise profile can be created in a manner that may be > slightly more intelligible

Re: [darktable-dev] Photo export slower with OpenCL

2016-09-09 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Hi, Am 09.09.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Aurélien PIERRE: since Ubuntu 16.04, the processing and exporting with OpenCL felt much slower than before. [...] Any clues ? Not really. However, one thing is obvious: [opencl_profiling] spent 124,9889 seconds in [Write Image (from host to device)] [ope

Re: [darktable-dev] Photo export slower with OpenCL

2016-09-09 Thread Pete Hall
Hello Ulrich, I've noticed the same thing. It's definitely related to ubuntu 16.04. I store my images on an NFS share, and ubuntu wants to use NFS version 4. My host doesn't support version 4, so in order to avoid the apparently really slow negotiation, I sped things up a LOT by specifying option