Re: [darktable-dev] Re: [darktable-user] open CL 2.0.6

2016-09-16 Thread Pete Hall
No appreciable difference darktable 2.0.6 running in ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64 bit vm in slackware 14.2 64 bit host. On 09/15/2016 01:14 AM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote: > Well, in your case I see the differences as only marginal - the time > spent in the OpenCL pixelpipe differs only by 2% between the two >

Re: [darktable-dev] Re: [darktable-user] open CL 2.0.6

2016-09-14 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Wrong group. Discussion is in darktable-users. ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

[darktable-dev] Re: [darktable-user] open CL 2.0.6

2016-09-14 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Well, in your case I see the differences as only marginal - the time spent in the OpenCL pixelpipe differs only by 2% between the two setting (in favor of TRUE). Not sure if differences persist if you would repeat profiling several times to get out any fluctuations. So it seems that your combi