Am 13.02.2016 um 18:35 schrieb johannes hanika:
sounds good to me.
would we need any visible indication that this scale is logarithmic?
or would the number changing logarithmically be indication enough?
I'd be sparingly with any additional gui element. I guess the feedback
by number is clear
sounds good to me.
would we need any visible indication that this scale is logarithmic?
or would the number changing logarithmically be indication enough?
-jo
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Ulrich Pegelow
wrote:
> Am 13.02.2016 um 12:03 schrieb johannes hanika:
>>>
>>> short question: is ther
Am 13.02.2016 um 12:03 schrieb johannes hanika:
short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus slider
with a logarithmic scale?
short answer: no. (other than just mapping some mislabeled value to
exp(v) in the gui callback or commit_params..
My idea: we implement a callb
hi,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Jean-Luc Coulon
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Le 13/02/2016 09:11, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus
>> slider with a logarithmic scale?
>
> What is the meaning of "bauhaus" in "bauhaus slider" ?
htt
Hi
Le 13/02/2016 09:11, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus
> slider with a logarithmic scale?
What is the meaning of "bauhaus" in "bauhaus slider" ?
Jean-Luc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus
slider with a logarithmic scale?
Background: I would need a slider for focal length (1mm to 1000mm) and
this would better scale logarithmically.
Ulrich
__
