I've just rolled back to v2.6.0 and frustratingly still seem to have this
issue.
To illustrate the problem, I've uploaded an example that shows it
particularly obviously.
This is a screenshot of the preview in lighttable (presumably the
camera-produced JPEG): https://flic.kr/p/24d3Ttv
This is th
A personal view: my deniose (profiled) works well in general (I often
only use it at 50% or less strength) but I do know that if I 'push' the
processing of the image then the default (ISO) setting for denoise will
not be satisfactory and the ISO setting then needs to be adjusted up
accordingly.
* Dave [02-18-19 14:38]:
> [My previous reply, repeated below, seems not to have made it to the list,
> apologies for the delay]
>
> Yes, I tried turning on the Denoise (Profiled) module and it detects the
> camera/lens and ISO but it doesn't significantly reduce the noise, if at
> all.
there is
[My previous reply, repeated below, seems not to have made it to the list,
apologies for the delay]
Yes, I tried turning on the Denoise (Profiled) module and it detects the
camera/lens and ISO but it doesn't significantly reduce the noise, if at
all.
__
I'm thinking color (chroma) noise. Did you apply any denoising? The
correction module "denoise (profiled)" with the color preset should
eliminate the chroma noise.
Am Do., 14. Feb. 2019 um 08:12 Uhr schrieb Dave :
>
> When I bought a new camera (Olympus E-M10 MkIII) last year, I noticed a lot
> o
When I bought a new camera (Olympus E-M10 MkIII) last year, I noticed a lot
of noise and areas of over-saturation in my photos when initially opening
them in darkroom, which I struggled to remove. Updating from darktable 2.4
to 2.6 solved the problem completely, presumably since it has support
(noi
