> On 28 May 2019, at 12:35, Torsten Bronger
> wrote:
>
> Hallöchen!
>
> Iain Wood writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> Yes, true, but it still wouldn't do the fisheye-hemi
>> thing. Whatever order they are applied in, the combination of
>> per
> On 28 May 2019, at 11:26, Torsten Bronger
> wrote:
>
> Hallöchen!
>
> Iain Wood writes:
>
>>> On 28 May 2019, at 01:11, Torsten Bronger
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I am pretty sure that all that
> On 28 May 2019, at 01:11, Torsten Bronger
> wrote:
>
> Hallöchen!
>
> Iain Wood writes:
>
>>> On 27 May 2019, at 19:40, Torsten Bronger
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Iain Wood writes:
>>>
>>>> I have spent many hou
> On 27 May 2019, at 19:40, Torsten Bronger
> wrote:
>
> Hallöchen!
>
> Iain Wood writes:
>
>> I have spent many hours attempting to reproduce fisheye-hemi using
>> lensfun inside darktable. I couldn't get anywhere close to it.
>
> I don’t known
I have spent many hours attempting to reproduce fisheye-hemi using lensfun
inside darktable. I couldn't get anywhere close to it. I think that is because
fisheye-hemi doesn't really correct a lens fault, it is more like applying a
creative distortion. Lensfun is great for corrections, but the fi
This is a great idea. Fisheye-hemi is the only reason I keep aperture around.
Rectilinear correction just doesn't do it, the fisheye-hemi correction makes
fisheye lenses useful, rather than just a weird novelty.
> On 27 May 2019, at 15:58, Dane Goodwin wrote:
>
> Hey all
>
> I came across thi