Hi,
I definitely agree that it shouldn't replace the current library (especially
considering the performance, didn't think it would be that slow).
I think the nicest way would be a checkbox or a dropdown in the jpeg export
section.
Nils
Von: Heiko Bauke
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. März 2017 19:43
A
Hi,
Am 17.03.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Holger Klemm:
I have read, the encoder is very slow...
I just compiled the guetzli tool, took some random image (jpeg file of
3000x2000 pixel) and recompressed this image, which took 5 minutes and
32 sec. on my laptop (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4500U CPU @ 1.80G
According to https://github.com/google/guetzli:
Introduction
Guetzli is a JPEG encoder that aims for excellent compression density at
high visual quality. Guetzli-generated images are typically 20-30% smaller
than images of equivalent quality generated by libjpeg. Guetzli generates
only sequentia
Then it could be an option as to which library was used.
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 at 15:37 Holger Klemm
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have read, the encoder is very slow...
>
> Holger
>
>
> Am Freitag, 17. März 2017, 15:16:08 CET schrieb Nils Holle:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Yesterday Google announced Guetzli, a jpeg encod
Hi,
I have read, the encoder is very slow...
Holger
Am Freitag, 17. März 2017, 15:16:08 CET schrieb Nils Holle:
> Hi!
>
> Yesterday Google announced Guetzli, a jpeg encoder producing better
> results than libjpeg as can be read here:
>
> https://research.googleblog.com/2017/03/announcing-guetz
Hi!
Yesterday Google announced Guetzli, a jpeg encoder producing better
results than libjpeg as can be read here:
https://research.googleblog.com/2017/03/announcing-guetzli-new-open-source-jpeg.html
Code is available on Github: https://github.com/google/guetzli/
Wouldn't that be a nice thing
FYI
The performance difference DT self-compiled vs. distributions binary package
has been confirmed for debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855359
Not sure about other distros. But could be similar.
Matthias
__
