Re: [darktable-dev] Latest git tip doesn't like some/many .NEFs

2016-02-13 Thread Pedro Côrte-Real
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote: > That's a limitation in the script that generates the list. Since > that's a CHDK camera that outputs a file with no metadata exiv2 > doesn't know what it is. Since I'm using exiv2 to generate the list > the match doesn't occur. We now have

Re: [darktable-dev] Q: bauhaus slider with logarithmic scale

2016-02-13 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Am 13.02.2016 um 18:35 schrieb johannes hanika: sounds good to me. would we need any visible indication that this scale is logarithmic? or would the number changing logarithmically be indication enough? I'd be sparingly with any additional gui element. I guess the feedback by number is clear

Re: [darktable-dev] Q: bauhaus slider with logarithmic scale

2016-02-13 Thread johannes hanika
sounds good to me. would we need any visible indication that this scale is logarithmic? or would the number changing logarithmically be indication enough? -jo On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote: > Am 13.02.2016 um 12:03 schrieb johannes hanika: >>> >>> short question: is ther

Re: [darktable-dev] Q: bauhaus slider with logarithmic scale

2016-02-13 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Am 13.02.2016 um 12:03 schrieb johannes hanika: short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus slider with a logarithmic scale? short answer: no. (other than just mapping some mislabeled value to exp(v) in the gui callback or commit_params.. My idea: we implement a callb

Re: [darktable-dev] Possible alternative to Markesteijn x-trans demosaic?

2016-02-13 Thread Pedro Côrte-Real
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Ingo Liebhardt wrote: > 3. As said, my approach is iterative. The above time is with three passes. > If I reduce to two passes, about 2 to 3 seconds can be shaved off. My first > impression is that after two passes further visual improvements become > marginal, but

Re: [darktable-dev] Possible alternative to Markesteijn x-trans demosaic?

2016-02-13 Thread Marc Cousin
Hi, There is an issue (http://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10333) with some RAWs which exhibit problems. I don't know if your demosaicing helps on this, but I thought it would be worth mentionning. Regards Marc On 09/02/2016 20:40, Ingo Liebhardt wrote: > Hi Dan, > > My present algorithm (3

Re: [darktable-dev] Q: bauhaus slider with logarithmic scale

2016-02-13 Thread johannes hanika
hi, On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Jean-Luc Coulon wrote: > Hi > > Le 13/02/2016 09:11, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus >> slider with a logarithmic scale? > > What is the meaning of "bauhaus" in "bauhaus slider" ? htt

Re: [darktable-dev] Q: bauhaus slider with logarithmic scale

2016-02-13 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon
Hi Le 13/02/2016 09:11, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit : > Hi, > > short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus > slider with a logarithmic scale? What is the meaning of "bauhaus" in "bauhaus slider" ? Jean-Luc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[darktable-dev] Q: bauhaus slider with logarithmic scale

2016-02-13 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Hi, short question: is there already an established way to get a bauhaus slider with a logarithmic scale? Background: I would need a slider for focal length (1mm to 1000mm) and this would better scale logarithmically. Ulrich __