On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 07:00:56 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 06:07:53 UTC, kahuna wrote:
It seems that latest version available from bitbucket
Are your previous build attempts also from BitBucket-hosted
code? The most up-to-date GDC source is on
On 7 November 2013 07:00, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 06:07:53 UTC, kahuna wrote:
>
>> It seems that latest version available from bitbucket
>>
>
> Are your previous build attempts also from BitBucket-hosted code? The most
> up-t
On Thursday, 7 November 2013 at 06:07:53 UTC, kahuna wrote:
It seems that latest version available from bitbucket
Are your previous build attempts also from BitBucket-hosted code?
The most up-to-date GDC source is on GitHub.
More info on this,
It seems that latest version available from bitbucket do compile
at least inside 4.7.3 without problems, I'll try to compile
libgphobos2.a from this version using the new gdc from and check
if it is a problem with gdc or with the libgphobos2 Makefiles.
Regards
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:51:07 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 10:49:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 02/11/13 04:56, kahuna wrote:
I have compiled it with gcc-4.8.1, but anyway it should
bootstrap itself.
Just to avoid doubt, I want to be
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:51:07 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 10:49:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 02/11/13 04:56, kahuna wrote:
I have compiled it with gcc-4.8.1, but anyway it should
bootstrap itself.
Just to avoid doubt, I want to be
On Saturday, 2 November 2013 at 10:49:50 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 02/11/13 04:56, kahuna wrote:
I have compiled it with gcc-4.8.1, but anyway it should
bootstrap itself.
Just to avoid doubt, I want to be absolutely clear what you're
doing here.
Kahuna, any news? Did you manage
On 02/11/13 04:56, kahuna wrote:
I have compiled it with gcc-4.8.1, but anyway it should bootstrap itself.
Just to avoid doubt, I want to be absolutely clear what you're doing here.
When you say "with gcc-4.8.1" are you talking about the actual GCC compiler you
already have installed on your
On Friday, 1 November 2013 at 10:03:42 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Friday, 1 November 2013 at 07:51:09 UTC, kahuna wrote:
I have tried to compile branch v1.x with gcc-4.7.3 and
although I get no error on thread.d (I get some bad references
to direct d_name.ptr, fixed removing .ptr) b
On Friday, 1 November 2013 at 10:03:42 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Friday, 1 November 2013 at 07:51:09 UTC, kahuna wrote:
I have tried to compile branch v1.x with gcc-4.7.3 and
although I get no error on thread.d (I get some bad references
to direct d_name.ptr, fixed removing .ptr) b
On Friday, 1 November 2013 at 07:51:09 UTC, kahuna wrote:
I have tried to compile branch v1.x with gcc-4.7.3 and although
I get no error on thread.d (I get some bad references to direct
d_name.ptr, fixed removing .ptr) but I get the same undefined
symbols when compiling with gdc, so I understan
On Friday, 1 November 2013 at 06:08:53 UTC, kahuna wrote:
I've been unable to compile gcc patches to gcc-4.8 on OSX, I
get an error in thread.d, an assert "Not implemented", it seems
that it is not getting the right version while compiling
initStack() and fiber_entryPoint(), if I comment out bo
I've been unable to compile gcc patches to gcc-4.8 on OSX, I get
an error in thread.d, an assert "Not implemented", it seems that
it is not getting the right version while compiling initStack()
and fiber_entryPoint(), if I comment out both asserts, as
expected it breaks the library and whenever
13 matches
Mail list logo
