On Sunday, 27 March 2016 at 16:55:18 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
There was a unrelated problem on windows where the '.exe'
extension was not appended when searching ar. This should be
fixed. There's still the problem that ar is only available as
'ar' with the windows binary toolchains. So if you
Am Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:36:19 +0200
schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> Am Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:25:27 +
> schrieb Basile B. :
>
> > On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 10:09:10 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > > I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
> > > including a detailed README to
Am Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:36:19 +0200
schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> Am Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:25:27 +
> schrieb Basile B. :
>
> > On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 10:09:10 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > > I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
> > > including a detailed README to
Am Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:31:34 +0200
schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> Am Sun, 27 Mar 2016 08:35:00 +
> schrieb Vladimir Panteleev :
>
>
> > I'm not sure this approach is the best - I think unescaping and
> > splitting should be done in one pass. Essentially, I think
> > arguments are separated by a
Am Sun, 27 Mar 2016 04:25:27 +
schrieb Basile B. :
> On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 10:09:10 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
> > including a detailed README to
> > https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD/tree/dport
> >
> > All par
Am Sun, 27 Mar 2016 08:35:00 +
schrieb Vladimir Panteleev :
> Thanks for working on this :)
>
> On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 22:37:53 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > I didn't realize response file parsing is that important for
> > windows, thanks for letting me know ;-) I guess there's no
>
Thanks for working on this :)
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 22:37:53 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I didn't realize response file parsing is that important for
windows, thanks for letting me know ;-) I guess there's no
proper documentation for response files or any test files?
It uses the Command
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 10:09:10 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
including a detailed README to
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD/tree/dport
All parameters are tested for simple cases but in complex
combinations there coul
Am Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:35:44 +
schrieb Vladimir Panteleev :
> On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 10:09:10 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
> > including a detailed README to
> > https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD/tree/dport
>
>
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 10:09:10 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
including a detailed README to
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD/tree/dport
Thanks for this.
I see that parsing response files isn't implemented yet. Respons
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 10:35:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 10:09:10 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
including a detailed README to
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD/tree/dport
Thanks for
Am Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:09:10 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
> including a detailed README to
> https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD/tree/dport
>
> All parameters are tested for simple cases but in complex
> combinations there co
I've finally finished the D port of GDMD and pushed everything
including a detailed README to
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDMD/tree/dport
All parameters are tested for simple cases but in complex
combinations there could still be some unknown bugs.
I think the D port should already be m
13 matches
Mail list logo
