On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 14:02:37 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 15:30, Daniel Kozák via D.gnu
wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 10:54:09 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> Optimal code sometimes needs a bit of coercing. You
> shouldn't need to pass weird options though.
Yes
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 at 02:18:42 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
As a broader point, though, do you think it would help improve
adoption of GDC (and perhaps the D ecosystem overall) if one
could `tar xfvz gdc-9.tar.gz && export PATH gdc/bin` in the
same way we do with DMD and LDC?
Yes, I do
On 8/19/19 4:02 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 03:47:04 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
I hope that there are plans for
convenient binary installs (rather than through package managers which
tend to be outdated, and cannot be installed on managed systems) as
there are with DMD a
On 8/19/19 3:59 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
It is possible, to share your code, so any one else could try why is gdc
faster than ldc? From what I can say, there is almost always a way to
make ldc as fast as gdc (sometimes you need to pass some specific args
to cimpiler or tweak a code a little bit)
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 15:30, Daniel Kozák via D.gnu
wrote:
>
> On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 10:54:09 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >
> > Optimal code sometimes needs a bit of coercing. You shouldn't
> > need to pass weird options though.
>
> Yes I agree, generaly one is good with -O and -(f)release
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 10:54:09 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Optimal code sometimes needs a bit of coercing. You shouldn't
need to pass weird options though.
Yes I agree, generaly one is good with -O and -(f)release and
sometimes with disable boundscheking, but with ldc there has been
som
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 05:50, James Blachly via D.gnu
wrote:
>
> I got around to finally compiling my project (processing high throughput
> sequencing data) and found GDC compiled code executed TWICE as fast as
> LDC compiled code, which itself was faster than DMD. I am truly surprised.
>
> Can't
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 10:00, Daniel Kozak via D.gnu
wrote:
>
> On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 03:47:04 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
> > I got around to finally compiling my project (processing high
> > throughput sequencing data) and found GDC compiled code
> > executed TWICE as fast as LDC compiled c
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 03:47:04 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
I hope that there are plans for
convenient binary installs (rather than through package
managers which tend to be outdated, and cannot be installed on
managed systems) as there are with DMD and LDC.
Kudos to the GDC team.
which
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 03:47:04 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
I got around to finally compiling my project (processing high
throughput sequencing data) and found GDC compiled code
executed TWICE as fast as LDC compiled code, which itself was
faster than DMD. I am truly surprised.
Can't test
I got around to finally compiling my project (processing high throughput
sequencing data) and found GDC compiled code executed TWICE as fast as
LDC compiled code, which itself was faster than DMD. I am truly surprised.
Can't test all my code yet as GDC 8.3.0 doesn't include support for
assoc a
11 matches
Mail list logo
