http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Pfau ---
The align(1) in epoll.d was introduced in 2.066 but IIRC there were also some
changes in align() handling at some point. I think it used to be ignored. But
either way, the compiler is correct and druntime (an
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
--- Comment #4 from vlevenf...@gmail.com ---
The library is the same - it is actually not phobos' epoll but libasync's epoll
that is being used in this specific instance (though the two files don't appear
to differ). So the same file is being used
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannesp...@gmail.com
Statu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Is the library different between 4.9.0 and 4.9.2?
Either the align was added to the library, or the compiler started doing what
the code requested.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching al
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
--- Comment #1 from vlevenf...@gmail.com ---
Found a fix: If I go into phobos' epoll.d and change align(1) to align(8),
everything works.
According to this thread
(https://github.com/nodejs/node-v0.x-archive/issues/4565) ARM systems require
64-bi
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
vlevenf...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|All |ARM
OS|All
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214
vlevenf...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlevenf...@gmail.com
--
You are r
