"Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" wrote in message
news:mailman.6598.1424298906.9932.d@puremagic.com...
The answer would still be no because of calling convention differences
- another reason why GDC and DMD are not ABI compatible.
However, if you used an extern(C) API, then that should be at least
"Johannes Pfau" wrote in message news:m5enbm$2t0e$1...@digitalmars.com...
The linker scripts also know about some details of the C/C++ codegen.
For example attribute(constructor) needs support from linker scripts.
(KEEP, SORT_NONE, PROVIDE_HIDDEN or similar) Without this support
constructor cal
"Mike" wrote in message news:cqzazaqxpwezignix...@forum.dlang.org...
If my theory is correct, GDC may have to make an internal linker script
specifically for D's code generation that marks such code as KEEP.
There was some discussion of this at dconf, and a custom linker script is
both strai
"Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" wrote in message
news:mailman.4028.1405352460.2907.d@puremagic.com...
It's not that which I'm worried about, it's tracking down gluey
changes before/after the conversion that will take the longest.
Maybe it would be worth getting a list of all pull requests in the
"Iain Buclaw" wrote in message news:phejgytsbkojsczbp...@forum.dlang.org...
Hi,
Looks like its that time of the year again.
Same as last time, will be raising a pull and struggling through the last
6 months of dmd development.
Apologies in advance.
Daniel, do you have a list of gluey-
