The message cannot be represented in 7-bit ASCII encoding and has been sent as a
binary attachment.
message.zip
Description: Binary data
Title: Global Tech - WE SELL MORE SO YOU SAVE MORE!!LOWEST PRICES! BEST BOXES!!
HELLO & WELCOME TO THE MAGIC BOX YEAR ANNUAL BLOW
OUT SALE!!!
Start receiving: Pay-Per View, HBO, Showtime,
Cinamax, Playboy, Spice and much more
I
VP-RX will take your sex life to new levels... Guaranteed!
Your penis will grow up to 3 inches
Your erections will be rock hard
Your sex drive will be supercharged
Your orgasms will be more intense
Your partner will be astounded
CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO
Title: Buy Online
Did you know you
can get prescription medications prescribed online with
NO PRIOR PRESCRIPTION REQUIRED!
NO PHYSICAL EXAM
NEEDED
Go here to order your
prescription medication online.Weight
Loss - Stop Smoking - Hair Growth - Men's Prescriptions - Pain
Relief
One of our
Title: cady
HI,Cpunks, I
have been receiving emails saying that I'm contributing to the "moral
decay of society" by selling the Banned CD. That may be, but I feel
Strongly that you have a right to benefit from this hard-to-find
infor
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
>the protection afforded by Black Blocs is quite thin (just indict them under
>organized crime or gang laws),
The similar clothing is enough to charge with gang membership and invoke
RICO. Also, the 'black bloc' tactic has 'premeditated' written all
I turned on a television set last night, for the first time in many
months. I was watching videotapes, but I caught fragments of shows
while tapes were rewinding, etc.
American TV has taken a definite turn for the vicious since I last
watched. It's still pablum-and-opiates, but someone has s
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Dynamite Bob wrote:
>"The property in question here is geostationary,"
>said Larry Hoenig, a San Francisco attorney
>representing Hughes Electronics. "Geostationary
>satellites sit above the equator in a fixed
>position; they do not rotate around the Earth. So
>the satell
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>Seems to me the only answer is to keep moving, don't settle in any one
>country (or store your possessions in any one jurisdiction) for a lengthy
>stay. A couple of years max.
Um, no. A couple of years would have been fine a decade ago, but
these days
I've been attempting to design a decentralized auction/
exchange system that permits pseudonymous participants.
By 'decentralized', I mean that NO central server, or
subset of individual servers, controls access to any
resource the system cannot work without; that there
is no single point o
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Eugene Leitl wrote:
>L.A. May Be Shot Down in Bid to Tax Satellites
>By Dan Whitcomb
>Auerbach insisted that he was not pushing for a tax on the satellites but
>was simply doing his job and trying to determine whether they should be
>taxed.
>
>``I'm neutral on the whole
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Um, what would the price premium be for a toilet that operates as a
>stoolie? 10X? 20X? Don't hold your breath waiting for it to become a
>standard.
The hell of it is, this provides a useful function. The only thing
that makes it invasive is that
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Back to the original question: It's obvious that NAI is operating
>under the belief that some ISPs are complying with some unspoken BXA
>idea/wannabe-law and blocking encrypted messages from "no-no"
>originating domains. Is this really the case,
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Sandman wrote:
>#
>#The part I like is that the wording suggests that the writer
>#is surprises that a population can have a lot of guns and "yet
>#maintains a remarkably low homicide and armed crime rate." Duh.
>
>A different society.
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Morlock Elloi wrote:
>So Adobe thugs will pour out of the building sprayng crowd with machine-gun
>fire ? Corporate commandos will make arrests and cart them to software
>sweatshops ?
>
>What exactly peaceful banner-carrying demonstrators on the public grounds
>should be afra
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>It should be obvious that these riots are not so much ideologically
>motivated (though that's the pseudo-rational), but testosterone motivated.
>Most of these monkeys couldn't spell anarchy let alone understand it
>philosophically. Let's not confuse
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>I'm sympathetic to the deceased's family. But it strikes me that if
>you assault a police vehicle with armed cops inside with the evident
>intent to do physical harm, you'd better be wearing a bulletproof vest.
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>There are several possible answers to what you have written. First, at
>least theoretically, your "'globalization' people" were elected to represent
>the people. In a democratic system, the people's "input" into the process
>is the ballot box choice
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Petro wrote:
>At 11:30 PM -0700 7/22/01, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>>On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> The pressures of commercial advertising--in the sense of mass media--have been
>with us for as long as there has been mass media.
>
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Does anyone have a link to this "B" form, or more exact data on it's
>contents? It seems a little pointless to fill out a form saying that
>"Unknown person refused to ID for a transaction of $3000.00. This
>"suspect" was 5'8" and 125#, brn hair, brn
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>While it is a consummation devoutly to be wished, I predict that the
>"backlash" will be gone in a mere matter of weeks, if not days. Let's
>face it: the people most likely to be Adobe *customers* are anything but
>hungry. A fat customer is an apa
Good point.
A Russian cryptographer was grabbed, unable to talk to his consulate
for at least three days, and the Russians don't say anything?
I smell a rat. Perhaps Dmitry was sold down the river.
(Note for non-USA readers: "sold down the river" is an americanism
for betrayal. It dates fr
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Subcommander Bob wrote:
>Report: TSU Law School Admissions Too Easy
You know, I don't have a problem with a school that's easy to
get into. Heck, I graduated from one. It is right and proper
that there should be schools easy to get into. It is also right
and proper t
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Declan wrote:
>#
># Yes, clearly I was wrong and this must be the real thing.
># I urge you to start an online campaign straightaway!
>
>I'm stunned you think this is a joke.
You misspelled "hoax". Think a
http://slashdot.org/yro/01/07/26/1553257.shtml
These are a bunch of people who want to make fundamental architectural
changes to the internet, to make it so they can prevent people from
getting services unless they are paid money.
Oddly enough, this comes at a time when I've been thinking
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>--
>
>The rear window had been smashed in when they whacked the cop with the four inch
>steel pipe, or when they whacked the cop with the two by four timber. so there was no
>problem with chucking it underhand and sideways. Plenty of room. One
>> `(3) FACTORS IN DETERMINING EXEMPTION- In determining whether a person
>> qualifies for the exemption under paragraph (2), the factors to be
>> considered shall include--
>> `(A) whether the information derived from the encryption research was
>> disseminated, and if so, whether it was dissemin
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, David Honig wrote:
>>You can create an executable, with source code, package it up and
>>send it to the copyright owner with a note that says "your protection
>>is broken: here's the proof."
>
>How about dropping them a note to send an engineer to DefCon?
Not a problem --
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, David Honig wrote:
>>Not a problem -- as long as what you're making available to the
>>public at DefCon is not a program that script kiddies can download
>>and use to break stuff.
>
>What's a 'program' in the above sentence? Is source a program? Source
>without the main(
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Tim May wrote:
>The critical point is that Congress is now in the business of
>criminalizing mere speech. mere research. Whether one quibbles about
>whether hackers "understand" the instructions on how to bypass crypto
>protections, or whether bombz d00dz "understand" the
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>If it's a crime to take actions specifically for the purpose of later
>rendering you unable to comply with a judge's order (is it?),
>how is escrowing it on the isle of man any different?
Oddly, I've been watching this one with some interest.
The
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, An Metet wrote:
>Your complaints about "free research" suggest that you have the sense
>that you are more valuable than or superior to other contributors.
He is not "superior" in any substantial way; however, his expertise
in law, combined with a willingness to actually disc
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>But the only place they can trace messages in a 'small world' model is at
>source/destination link, which means they're already on top of you. If
>they're out fishing all they'd see is a bunch of packets sent between
>remailers with the body encrypted sev
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm quite aware of the attack. It's not guaranteed successful yet.
True. But it beats the snot out of guessing keys.
Offhand, I'd estimate that if three US remops were taken down
forcefully, and the federal law looked as though any other could
b
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>
>> Second, it pretty much means the US is going to have to withdraw
>> from the space treaty of 1965, which bans space weapons. This
>> latter is actually more interesting to me, beca
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>Note the commentary about changing the budget to prevent other flags from
>being planted...
>
>http://www.harmonize.com/swdroundup/Apollo11.htm
>
>
Note the commentary that it was "strictly a symbolic activity, as the
United Nations Treaty on Outer Space
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Tim May wrote:
>Just a note about what's happening with Web advertising.
>
>Went to a site, www.imdb.com, to check something about a film. Up popped
>a doubleclick.net ad. In front of the main page, obscuring it. I clicked
>the close box. Up popped a _different_ ad. I clicke
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Tim May wrote:
>(I'm surprised no one has urged me to use Lynx. Is it still being used?)
Some of us still use it, but we tend not to recommend it to
anyone - it has become fairly obscure and, to be honest, lots
of webpages suck pretty hard when viewed through lynx. I
find
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Tim May wrote:
>( I expect 98% of the readers here have no idea what a "Symbolics" is or
>was.)
Heh. I would cheerfully commit a felony or two to get my hands
on a Symbolics Ivory chip fabbed using modern technology and running
at a GHz or so. When I was a student, we ha
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Tim May wrote:
>To all who have contributed ideas about turning off Java, blah blah, l
>wasn't really _complaining_ about my personal situation. I was noting
>the bizarre world of online advertising in which the right third of a
>page is filled with ads, the top third is fi
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Tim May wrote:
>(Ads could be tied-in to the content, with some light crypto or copright
>protection. A "circumvention" of this liight crypto could be a DMCA
>violation. I would not be surprised to see this already impicated in the
>DVD cases: that 5 minute period of trail
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Black Unicorn wrote:
>Do I think that software should have products liability attached to it? No.
>Do I think strict liability stifles innovation? No.
I would actually like to make a smaller point here. Broadly I
agree with BU, but I'd like to analyze it a little.
If
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>>In addition, of course, organized crime groups use the Internet for
>>communications (usually encrypted) and for any other purposes when
>>they see it as useful and profitable.
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
>
>> Maybe, maybe not. I'm the first to agree that porn *should* be treated as
>> equal to other speech,
>
>But 'porn' is no more speech than 'murder' is. What makes porn so
>offensive isn't the pictures, but the
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Jim Choate wrote:
>The desire to get the 'speech' is what drives the act. To address one and
>ignore the other is simply not reasonable. The images should be taken as
>evidence of the act and then destroyed. They should not in and of
>themselves be left in circulation to pr
On Sat, 18 Aug -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Will someone publish the home address of the prosecuting attorney and judge issuing
>the warrant?
>
There are serious risks in doing so. Having such a post linked
to your meatspace identity could result in persecution - and
most likely eventually p
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Gary Jeffers wrote:
>My fellow Cypherpunks,
>
> Ray Dillinger believes that scanning would assist oppressors as
>much as regular users. Joseph Ashwood agrees with this and further
>thinks that the Internet overhead of a scanner would be a serious
>probl
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, John Young wrote:
>See 9-page judgment in TIF format:
>
> http://cryptome.org/jdb-hit.tif (262KB)
>
>In addition to 10 years Jim was also fined $10,000 due
>immediately and faces three years of probation. No
>computer use and a long list of other prohibitions
>including
tremendous
pressure to produce something, anything, that will be effective
against them.
Ray
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Michael Motyka wrote:
>What the hell is that Latin phrase for "who will watch the watchers" ???
The famous phrase is "Quis Custodiet ipsos Custodes?"
It translates a little better as "who guards the guardians",
and is in a very subtle way sarcastic, because it's tal
I'm of the opinion that an *attempted* crime should probably be
punished as a crime. The question is of action, knowledge, and
intent, rather than result.
I'm also of the opinion that people do not have the right to take
reasonably foreseeable risks with other people's lives or property,
a
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Steven Furlong wrote:
>Gary Jeffers wrote:
>>I was aware that posting binary/executables of crypt code from the
>> U.S. was illegal. Is source posting of crypt from U.S. illegal too?
>That issue is highly contentious. The summary is: encryption is
>considered a muniti
security of the Country Mile Cipher.
So confident, in fact, that if anyone can come up with a viable
attack on it, I will cheerfully pay the *first* person to do so
fifty US dollars. :-)
Ray Dillinger
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Michael Motyka wrote:
>
>> safer, cleaner place but calling McVeigh a "freedom fighter" is off the
>> mark. 0 points for that one.
>
>Why?
Interesting question, actually... The difference between a
"random crazy" and a "freedom fighter" can be a
Hmmm. These devices could be useful, even without using
them as credit cards. I wonder if you could buy a batch
of them from the manufacturer with custom software installed?
It would sure be nice if I could make a physical key token
that would render my system completely useless if the ke
>On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:52:54AM -0400, Jodi Hoffman wrote:
>> And more from this "only TEENAGERS and adults" website...
Ms. Hoffman, please stop posting this crap to the Cypherpunks
list. It won't help. It is damned insulting to everyone here
that you seem to expect us to confuse conte
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Marcel Popescu wrote:
>Would you mind writing a "tutorial for the beginner cryptanalist"?
>
>Mark
Maybe in a year or so. Right now I'm working on a reference book on
cryptographic protocols, and it's looking like it's gonna take a pretty
major chunk of work.
Meanwhil
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Rival products include HushMail, ZixMail, Disappearing Inc. and Authentica.
>
I own Disappaering Inc. We have no such product and we have no
such product under development.
Ray Dillinger
;t be exported, that would be a good sign.
Aside from that, I don't know the particulars of the encryption they
use - they claim to use a product cipher, but so far I haven't seen
what the components of the product cipher are, what the key lengths
are, how they do key management, etc etc etc.
Ray Dillinger
Disappearing Inc
ner of the domain name "disappearing-inc.com", which I have
not yet used.
This pisses me off now they'll probably try to evict me as
a cybersquatter.
Ray Dillinger
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>
>
>On Sun, 24 Sep 2000
d put this site up on my
own server way back in April. It's scheduled to be installed
on October 3. Argh, Argh, Argh
Ray
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>
>
>
>Correction:
>
>After a web search through USPTO, I find
ntensely competitive universities, then
you have to pull out and go to an inferior private college instead.
Ray
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Kevin Elliott wrote:
>A
>cryptographically strong PRNG would then be a PRNG with a very large
>period and some way of reinjecting randomness to guarantee the device
>never begins to recycle.
>--
>
Isn't that a misnomer though? If randomness is reinjected to
prevent th
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Kevin Elliott wrote:
>Actually if you can pull that off you've got yourself a darn fine
>real random number generator- any PRNG has to have some period after
>which it will begin to recycle (assuming no other randomness in
>introduced into the system), in which case you j
theoretically guess a 128-bit encryption key
on the first try, and I wouldn't expect that to happen.
Ray
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Jim Choate wrote:
>
>On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>> Plaintext looks like plaintext.
>
>Yeah, if the only thing you right is simple English. Most of the planet
>doesn't speak English and their plaintext doesn't necessarily loo
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
>I'm currently thinking of whether or not it is feasable to put stego
>data into EVERY .mp3 downloaded. just put random data into those not
>intended to carry a message.
For the sake of us audiophiles, please don't. MP3 is tinny and flat
at best; it ticks
>>On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm currently thinking of whether or not it is feasable to put stego
>>>data into EVERY .mp3 downloaded. just put random data into those not
>>>intended to carry a message.
>
On Fri, 6 Oct
Hi everybody;
I have no interest in Chomsky flames and wish they would die.
In fact, I'm going to *MAKE* them die, for me at least, by
filtering posts on chomsky's name. (yes, this post right here
is going into the bitbucket when it gets back to me from the
list).
I'm just dropping this
Reflections on AES and DES
DES was developed by a team that wanted to call it "Dataseal"
at IBM. Some IBM flacks renamed it Demon (for "demonstration
cipher"), a name the original developers didn't like. So they
agitated against the new name, and eventually someone decided
to rename
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, jim bell wrote:
>> A popular, but false, myth. The video cards radiate more than the CRT's.
>> Laptops tend to be the worst offenders.
>>
>> --Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>As to the video cards...
>Sorry, Lucky, but you're going to have to support this a little better
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Arnold G. Reinhold wrote:
>The fact that some people put Medeco's in glass doors, doesn't mean
>Medeco should never develop a better lock.
I don't have a problem with people who manufacture locks.
I have a problem with the people who sell them.
A sign of irrational f
>On Wednesday, October 11, Bo Elkjaer Wrote:
>>Yesterday oct. 10 NSA was granted another patent for a >cryptographic device
>invented by William Friedman. The >application for the >patent was filed oct. 23 1936
>-- 64 years >ago.
>
On 11 Oct 2000, raze wrote:
>My question is this; why would
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jim Choate wrote:
>No stupid, there are lot's of persons called the 'market'. There is no
>'market' without those individuals. When the market goes out of
>equilibrium then free market mechanisms are not enough to correct.
They most assuredly are enough to correct the prob
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, jim bell wrote:
>Naturally, a chemical solution (pun not directly intended...but I'll take it
>anyway) becomes apparent. If the ultimate motivation of the car siezures is
>to sell them and keep the money, what would happen if somebody acquired a
>few ounces or gallons of P
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, David Honig wrote:
>At 08:06 PM 10/24/00 -0400, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>>If nobody comes up with some filterware that works, then there will
>>probably be continuing pressure to regulate content.
>
>Its called 'parenting' but most are too
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, David Honig wrote:
>Although its hazardous if done wrong [cf recent PGP problems], is
>tarnished by the Fedz/Denning/etc, and might have no use in a personal
>privacy tool (your diary dies with you), isn't it too dogmatic to rule out
>key escrow for tools intended for use by
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Adam Back wrote:
>| Each node expects one packet from each link id in each time unit.
>| Extra packets are queued for processing in later time units.
>| However, if a node does not receive a packet for a link id in a
>| particular time unit, it stops normal processing of pac
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, David Honig wrote:
>At 02:13 AM 11/6/00 -0500, Tim May wrote:
>> I just can't think of anything
>>the law requires me to have in my house. As it should be.
>
>* running water
>* N toilets per hectare
>* electricity
>* walls, stairs, floors made to certain state minima (stan
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Jim Burnes wrote:
>I find it extremely interesting that this is all going down in the
>state that was covered in detail in the excellent book 'VoteScam'.
>This book, written by the Collier brothers, details massive voter fraud in
>Dade county. When the Colliers discovered
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>US Citizenship is required, as is successful completion of a medical evaluation,
>polygraph interview and an extensive background investigation.
>
>A "medical evaluation"??
>
>http://www.odci.gov/cia/employment/jobpostings/architectstud.htm
Pretty
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, David Honig wrote:
>At 10:18 PM 11/27/00 -0500, Ray Dillinger wrote:
>>I don't think I care to waste any effort on figuring out
>>secure ways to kill people outside the law.
>
>Would you feel better if it were within the law?
Not very much
No, it did not block it. I got the executable in a posting from
openpgp.com.
However, since I run Linux, it's pretty irrelevant to me. :-)
Bear
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Pier Carlo Montecucchi wrote:
>YES.
>
>NORTON ANTIVIRUS BLOCKED IT.
>
>Pier Carlo Montecu
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Steve Mynott wrote:
>Ken Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>On a tangent a friend claimed Americans didn't have electric kettles
>for boiling water.
>
>Can anyone confirm whether this is true?
sigh. Americans tend not to call something a "kettle" unless it's
large, at
On the larger purchases, the costs drop down to the forty-cents-a-minute
range. Totally worth it if you really *need* anonymity on the phone.
Of course, anonymity is relative; these phones have built-in GPS chips
for 911 calls, and these are activated from the central office, not by
a 91
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Phillip Zakas wrote:
>
>Just a minor correction to the below posting: cell phone locations are NOT
>calculated using GPS. They're triangulated via the three nearest cell sites
>reading the cell phone signal. Accuracy is much lower than with GPS, but
>good enough for cops t
ly acquired Motorolla
>Timeport. Not seeing any activity in the xmit circuitry when the battery is
>plugged in and the power is turned off. Of course I'm having trouble
>putting the case back on the phone correctly but I'll figure that out later
>;)
>
>phillip zakas
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, David Honig wrote:
>At 08:17 AM 1/8/01 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
>>and there are very few opportunities for real misunderstanding. We know
>
>The meaning of 'billion' differs by three orders of magnitude
>across the pond. That's plenty of room for confusion :-)
>
And in th
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Tim May wrote:
>
>Ray, you seem knowledgeable in some areas. But your pontifications on
>California basements, cellphone GPS, etc., are very "Choatean" in
>nature. Something you might want to look at.
You can trust anything I say about Math or Progr
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Blank Frank wrote:
> But according to Whistler testers, Microsoft issued build 2410 of its
>next version of Windows on Thursday. New in this build are many
>user-interface tweaks, as well as the incorporation of new anti-piracy
>code.
>...
>No more casual copying?
>The most
ply all,
spam.
I'd really like it if somebody has figured out a way for a
group to form consensus and act on that consensus as though
it were a single individual -- capable of participating in
general protocols.
But individual solutions to problems like the above would
be a great s
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, dmolnar wrote:
> 1) To post a message, sender S takes a 2-dollar coin and then
> uses some kind of verifiable secret sharing protocol to split it
> into shares.
>
> 4) If a group agent thinks the message is spam, it sends its
> share to Engine
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, An Metet wrote:
>Suppose can-sats WERE launched illegally, and then started broadcasting
> signals,
>along with a spoken commentary by Radio Free North America (so Joe
>Sixpack has an excuse when those nice detector van gentlemen knock on
>his door and ask why he's listeni
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Aimee Farr wrote:
>The Most Honorable Sir:
>
>
>And the girl was amazed and reached out with both hands to take the lovely
>toy; but the wide-pathed earth yawned there in the plain of Nysa, and the
>lord, Host of Many, with his immortal horses sprang out upon her -- the Son
>o
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, A. Melon wrote:
>Does anyone know the law regarding duplication of out of print
>books/other works?
It's the same law as the law regarding duplication of in-print
books/other works. There are places and situations in which the
enforcement varies depending on whether it's
Press to be excluded from future offers .
dabnngpatzbynxgod
hy iiq nv
Title: ghhgfhffsshhsg
Prescription Drugs Shipped
Overnight to Your Door!
Visit Our Online Drugstore Now
& SAVE!
Free Prescriptions
by Licensed US Doctors!
Trim your waistline with:
Phentermine, Bontril
t and use 3-4 chained remailers with random delays.
By the time the message is delivered, it will be many hours/days since the
message was sent.
--
Keith Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- OpenPGP Key: 0x79269A12
No More Paying for Movies & Events on CABLE! Free TV
is Here!
***NEWEST VERSION - Released September 30 2003***
* All New Movie Releases FREE
* Adult Movies FREE
* Wrestling, UFC, & Boxing PPV's FREE
* Live Music Concerts FREE
Bottom line: Anything you would normally buy you get
Free with thi
Rated the most potent male
enlargement program on the market
100% Guaranteed you'll get growth or your
money back
Q: Why should I use Cialagen ?A: Simply put, this
doctor-recommended system is the fastest, easiest and most effective way to add
2, 3, even 5 of rock-hard manhood to your peni
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
