Re: Stealth Computing Abuses TCP Checksums

--On Wednesday, 29 August, 2001 23:25 -0700 Bill Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://fyi.cnn.com/2001/TECH/internet/08/29/stealth.computing/index.html > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/08/29/199205&mode=thread > > A group of researchers at Notre Dame figured out how to use the >

Re: Real-world steganography

--On Tuesday, 01 October, 2002 13:54 +1200 Peter Gutmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently came across a real-world use of steganography which hides extra > data in the LSB of CD audio tracks to allow (according to the vendor) the > equivalent of 20-bit samples instead of 16-bit and assort

Re: Real-world steganography

--On Monday, 30 September, 2002 22:15 -0500 Jeremey Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Paul Krumviede wrote: >| i've seen comments in reviews of professional CD mastering >| gear that there are other, seem

Re: What email encryption is actually in use?

--On Wednesday, 02 October, 2002 10:54 -0500 Jeremey Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Udhay Shankar N wrote: >| At 10:04 AM 10/2/02 -0500, Jeremey Barrett wrote: >| >|> Amusingly, virtually none of them support STARTLS on any other protocol. >|> :) IMAP and POP are almost all supported only

Re: Real-world steganography

--On Tuesday, 01 October, 2002 13:54 +1200 Peter Gutmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I recently came across a real-world use of steganography which hides extra data in the LSB of CD audio tracks to allow (according to the vendor) the equivalent of 20-bit samples instead of 16-bit and assorted othe