* Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-02 17:00]:
>
> Your comparison of your email inbox and your living room being equivalent
> is flawed on several layers. The first is the concept of 'privacy', you
> have it in your living room because you have a door and locks. You don't
> have any of that
* John Kozubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-02 19:27]:
>
> That is incorrect. AOL owns their network, and they can respond to your
> arbitrary communications on their network in any way they see fit.
Unfortunately, you're correct.
> Maybe they will deliver your email to your AOL subscribing fri
* Sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-04 17:00]:
>
> > Yes, this is the problem I'm trying to address. Normally when Alice
> > tries to transmit information to Bob, if Mallory decides to sabotage
> > the communication, this is a denial of service attack, forbidden by
> > criminal law.
>
> Why
* Sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-05 17:29]:
>
> > > Why is it forbidden by law?
> >
> > I can think of hundreds of reasons DoS attacks are illegal. Now I'm
> > not sure if it's illegal everywhere; I'm only familar with the way
> > it's written in the California Penal code, which is where Ma
I have a question on what seems to be a defect in the Applied Crypto
book, and I couldn't get an answer out of Schneier. Could any of you
please clarify my issue?
My question is regarding Schneier's write up of SKID3 on page 56. He
states that the protocol is not secure against man-in-the-middle
I compiling the Mixmaster remailer, I get an error the OpenSSL was not
compiled with IDEA support. However, OpenSSL was supposed to have
compiled with IDEA out of the box, with only an option to disable it.
What am I missing?
I've recently discovered MAPS when messages I send to friends started
bouncing back. I'm finding that large ISP's are paying mailabuse.org
for lists of IP's, and mailabuse.org isn't taking care to ensure the
blacklisted IP's are from known spammers, they're targeting broad
ranges of IP's, and reje
* Len Sassaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-22 18:52]:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Eric Murray wrote:
>
> It's been a while since I really worked on the Install script -- Mixmaster
> 3.0 doesn't use it -- but this looks to be to be a bug that existed and
> was fixed sometime around a year ago. What ver
* Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-22 16:08]:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Eric Murray wrote:
>
> > I think that line means that mixmaster's install script isn't
> > properly identifying the version of Openssl. If it were
> > me, I'd fix the Mixmaster install script.
>
> The install script
