Re: Ruling Says Parents Have Right to See List of Sites Students Visit

2000-11-11 Thread Bob Jonkman
I want to tell you what An Metet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said about "Ruling Says Parents Have Right to S" on 11 Nov 2000, at 0:41 > In an opinion sure to heighten the tension between some parents > and school systems over the Internet's role in publicly financed > education, a New Hampshire judge has

Re: CDR: A note to virus authors

2001-12-06 Thread Bob Jonkman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I want to tell you what Alfred Qaeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said about "CDR: A note to virus authors" on 5 Dec 2001 at 14:31 > >>"The subject line says 'Hi' [...] > > Authors, How can you put so much effort into writing cool virii > and do such an amateur job on

Re: corporate vs. state, TD's education

2004-03-25 Thread Bob Jonkman
ur interview she reminds us that Canada was opened up by British fur companies operating on the same principle. = End quote = The RealAudio transcript is at http://www.cbc.ca/dispatches/audio/031022_drohan.rm -- -- -- -- Bob Jonkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: PlayFair > Sarovar

2004-04-19 Thread Bob Jonkman
That seemed short-lived. Both links to the Playfair project at Sarovar are dead: http://sarovar.org/projects/playfair/ and http://playfair.sarovar.org/ The search function doesn't come up with anything either... Has there been any further news on this? --Bob. This is what R. A. Hettinga <[

Re: Email tapping by ISPs, forwarder addresses, and crypto proxies

2004-07-30 Thread Bob Jonkman
This is what J.A. Terranson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said about "Re: Email tapping by ISPs, forwarde" on 24 Jul 2004 at 18:44 > > On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote: > > > There might be blind cypherpunks, we don't discriminate[1], > > There Is No We. > > > [1] the original phone phreak

Re: "ID Rules Exist, But Can't Be Seen"

2004-10-06 Thread Bob Jonkman
This is what Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said about ""ID Rules Exist, But Can't Be Seen"" on 30 Sep 2004 at 17:06 > For instance, is it indeed possible that revealing this rule would > pose an additional security risk? If such a rule exists (and it does) > then hijackers obviously already kno