Note that Listproc didn't explain why the message was rejected. My
majordomo setup bounced this message because of its length, requiring me
to approve it by hand. Perhaps openpgp bounced it for a similar reason?
Cheers,
-Brian
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am about t
At least one is still feeding cyberpass.net (infonex). The cyberpass
node has "lost" zubzcribers in the past. So hooking in at two (or more)
nodes and filtering duplicates might be a good idea.
Cheers,
-Brian
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Eric Murray wrote:
> I haven't seen any cypherpunks list tra
I run a list, "reg", for just the purpose you note below. It's a normal
'domo mailing list, and zubzcribes should go [EMAIL PROTECTED] It
sticks a "[r]" token is the subject line for easy filtering.
Also [EMAIL PROTECTED] neither receives from nor passes posts to
cypherpunks.*@toad.com.
Thanks
http://www.l-3com.com/cs-east/programs/infosec/privatel.htm
A triple-DES bump-in-the-cord encrypter, retails for ~US$600.
Any actual retail product offerings from Starium? How many years has it
been? POTS encryption _should_ be a killer app, even if noone realizes it
yet. Why would someone fe
cyberpass has "lost" its subscriber list at least once, so you might want
to confirm that you actually are currently subscribed. SSZ has occasional
extended downtimes and the charming CDR prefix. I'm unsure of the status
of algebra.com, as Igor has asked me to deliver to those who were
subscribe
I would like to announce the "secret-admirers" mail list.
The "secret-admirers" list is intended to function in a manner similar
to the well-known Usenet newsgroup "alt.anonymous.messages". This
newsgroup serves as a dead drop for communications in which the recipient
wishes to remain unknown.
ting is required?
>
> You also might want to reduce the default resend period on this list if
> possible. The 4 day normal for sendmail might be problematic. Set it to
> something like 1 day.
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, BMM wrote:
>
> > I would like to announce the "
ec 2000, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
> BMM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By CDR-like, I meant that it might be useful to grow the list in a manner
> > similar to the cypherpunks list in order both to protect against SPoF as
> > well as to distribute load (alt.anonymous.messages is
Traffic should be flowing normally.
Thanks,
-Brian
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, BMM wrote:
> minder.net's ISP's T3 to sprintlink has been down for ~12 hours. This has
> caused us to disappear from large portions of the 'net (hence the 30k
> messages stacked up in the
The list is gatewayed from/to alt.anonymous.messages, which provides a bit
more cover. I agree that it would be more useful as an extension of
a.a.m than standalone.
Thanks,
-Brian
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Bill Stewart wrote:
> It's cute, but it won't wash.
> The problem is that a list like this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are the same list.
I've been getting plenty of traffic via the minder, ssz, and lne nodes.
Thanks,
-Brian
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Ralph Wallis wrote:
>
> >I received this through minder.net, but I'm subscribed thr
jfrjmjicug , xebrkc , rtytbrgjg
12 matches
Mail list logo
